The way forward for assessing the human health safety of cosmetics in the EU: Proceedings of Workshop 2

Under the European Cosmetic Regulation, safety assessments of cosmetics and their ingredients must be conducted without the use of animals. This regulatory requirement poses a number of challenges, as validated alternative methods are only available for some of the toxicological endpoints that are typically considered in standard human health risk assessments. Despite significant progress since the ban in 2013, particularly in the development of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for local and acute toxicity, and for mutagenicity/genotoxicity, there remains an urgent need for non-animal test methods to assess systemic toxicity, which often becomes evident after repeated or long-term exposure. Currently, no validated animal-free alternatives are available for assessing sub-acute, sub-chronic and chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity, developmental/reproductive toxicity, or for a major part of toxicokinetics. In response to these challenges, the Methodology Working Group of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety organised a dedicated workshop in December 2024 to discuss advances in the application of Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) as a strategic animal-free approach for the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients. The workshop focused on a number of important key issues for the practical application of NAMs and NGRA, their regulatory acceptance and identification of possible (partial) solutions to overcome existing limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Toxicology
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-025-04275-x
Primary Topic
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The way forward for assessing the human health safety of cosmetics in the EU: Proceedings of Workshop 2

SCCS - Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety
Archives of Toxicology
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
article

The way forward for assessing the human health safety of cosmetics in the EU: Proceedings of Workshop 2

SCCS - Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety
article en

Abstract

Under the European Cosmetic Regulation, safety assessments of cosmetics and their ingredients must be conducted without the use of animals. This regulatory requirement poses a number of challenges, as validated alternative methods are only available for some of the toxicological endpoints that are typically considered in standard human health risk assessments. Despite significant progress since the ban in 2013, particularly in the development of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for local and acute toxicity, and for mutagenicity/genotoxicity, there remains an urgent need for non-animal test methods to assess systemic toxicity, which often becomes evident after repeated or long-term exposure. Currently, no validated animal-free alternatives are available for assessing sub-acute, sub-chronic and chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity, developmental/reproductive toxicity, or for a major part of toxicokinetics. In response to these challenges, the Methodology Working Group of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety organised a dedicated workshop in December 2024 to discuss advances in the application of Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) as a strategic animal-free approach for the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients. The workshop focused on a number of important key issues for the practical application of NAMs and NGRA, their regulatory acceptance and identification of possible (partial) solutions to overcome existing limitations.

Archives of Toxicology
Beiersdorf (Germany) (DE), Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), European Food Safety Authority (IT), Unilever (United Kingdom) (GB), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Chester (GB), University of Bedfordshire (GB), University of Groningen (NL), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), University of Milan (IT), Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (US), Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (DE), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Toxicologie Alimentaire (FR), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), Federal Office of Public Health (CH), Cosmetics Europe (BE), Joint Research Centre (IT), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail (FR), National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge (PT), Institut Jean Lamour (FR), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), General Chemical State Laboratory, Procter & Gamble (United States) (US), Gdańsk Medical University (PL), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.