Security risks to commercial ships in the Arctic Ocean due to high tension among states

Navigation of ships in the Arctic Ocean is beneficial for world trade. However, ship security threats may appear due to maritime disputes. This paper aims to identify navigation security risks at different escalation levels among arctic states. In this paper, a conflict escalation game theory for three Arctic states is carried out. At each escalation scenario, an aggressor state has the option to practice certain tactics. Tactics were selected by examining similar maritime dispute conflicts, such as military exercises, rescue operations, and broadcasting safety messages to claim territorial rights in dispute sea zones. Then, escalation scenarios are examined, showing the navigation threats for commercial ships. Results show that a middle-level escalation by an aggressive state could be beneficial to achieving its territorial claims. On the other hand, several navigation risks could cause maritime casualties in a sensitive area. Several studies have covered the issue of safety navigation in the Arctic Ocean and the need for cooperation among states. The originality of this paper lies in examining how each escalation phase could cause risk to commercial ships, urging the need to establish safe navigation zones in the area.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Polar Science
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2026.101356
Primary Topic
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Security risks to commercial ships in the Arctic Ocean due to high tension among states

Hristos Karahalios
Polar Science
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
article

Security risks to commercial ships in the Arctic Ocean due to high tension among states

Hristos Karahalios
article en

Abstract

Navigation of ships in the Arctic Ocean is beneficial for world trade. However, ship security threats may appear due to maritime disputes. This paper aims to identify navigation security risks at different escalation levels among arctic states. In this paper, a conflict escalation game theory for three Arctic states is carried out. At each escalation scenario, an aggressor state has the option to practice certain tactics. Tactics were selected by examining similar maritime dispute conflicts, such as military exercises, rescue operations, and broadcasting safety messages to claim territorial rights in dispute sea zones. Then, escalation scenarios are examined, showing the navigation threats for commercial ships. Results show that a middle-level escalation by an aggressive state could be beneficial to achieving its territorial claims. On the other hand, several navigation risks could cause maritime casualties in a sensitive area. Several studies have covered the issue of safety navigation in the Arctic Ocean and the need for cooperation among states. The originality of this paper lies in examining how each escalation phase could cause risk to commercial ships, urging the need to establish safe navigation zones in the area.

Polar ScienceVol. 47
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.