Digital data privacy concerns of cognitively normal and impaired older adults participating in a passive digital monitoring study and response to an educational intervention

Abstract Background Passive digital monitoring of real‐world behaviors holds potential for identifying cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). However, little is known about how privacy concerns may affect older adults’ participation in these studies, or how to educate older adults on mitigating privacy risks. This study aimed to characterize digital privacy concerns in older adults enrolling in a passive digital monitoring study and evaluate the efficacy of an educational intervention. Method Fifty‐one older adults (mean age: 74.94±5.29 years) enrolled in this study, with 32 classified as cognitively‐normal and 19 cognitively‐impaired (MoCA‐blind cut‐off=18). At baseline, participants answered questions addressing level of general and study‐specific digital data privacy concerns and self‐perceived knowledge on maintaining data privacy. Following a brief educational presentation reviewing data protection measures in this study (e.g., specifying data collected/not collected, instruction on deactivating collection of specific data elements), privacy concerns were re‐assessed. A 2 (Time; pre/post) x 2 (Condition; general/study‐specific) x 2 (Cognitive Status; cognitively‐normal/impaired) mixed model ANOVA analyzed the effect of the educational intervention on privacy concerns, and a 2 (Time) x 2 (Cognitive Status) mixed model ANOVA analyzed its effect on self‐perceived knowledge. Result In the privacy concern model, there was a significant within‐subjects effect of Condition, F (1,49)=13.69, p <.001, η p 2 =.22, with greater concern about general versus study‐specific data privacy. A significant Condition x Cognitive Status interaction, F (1,49)=4.16, p = .05, η p 2 =.08, indicated cognitively‐impaired participants endorsed lower concern about general privacy than cognitively‐normal participants. A significant main effect of Time, F (1,49)=23.62, p <.001, η p 2 = .33, indicated privacy concerns were reduced following the intervention. The remaining two‐ and three‐way interactions were not significant, p 's >.21. No significant main effects or interactions were found in the knowledge model, p 's >.09. Conclusion Older adults with and without cognitive impairment expressed greater confidence in their study‐related digital data privacy despite having general privacy concerns. A brief educational intervention effectively reduced participants’ privacy concerns. Results suggest educational efforts by research teams can attenuate digital data privacy concerns in older adults participating in ADRD digital monitoring studies. As digital tools are increasingly incorporated in ADRD studies, it is crucial researchers prioritize participants’ digital data privacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_107144
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital data privacy concerns of cognitively normal and impaired older adults participating in a passive digital monitoring study and response to an educational intervention

Edison Thomaz, Justin F. Rousseau, Nayanika Ghosh, Jared F. Benge et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
4.20
article

Digital data privacy concerns of cognitively normal and impaired older adults participating in a passive digital monitoring study and response to an educational intervention

Edison Thomaz, Justin F. Rousseau, Nayanika Ghosh, Jared F. Benge, Rosemary A. Lester‐Smith, Yufei Shen, Ethan Biswas, Rachel E Mis, June Cui
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Passive digital monitoring of real‐world behaviors holds potential for identifying cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). However, little is known about how privacy concerns may affect older adults’ participation in these studies, or how to educate older adults on mitigating privacy risks. This study aimed to characterize digital privacy concerns in older adults enrolling in a passive digital monitoring study and evaluate the efficacy of an educational intervention. Method Fifty‐one older adults (mean age: 74.94±5.29 years) enrolled in this study, with 32 classified as cognitively‐normal and 19 cognitively‐impaired (MoCA‐blind cut‐off=18). At baseline, participants answered questions addressing level of general and study‐specific digital data privacy concerns and self‐perceived knowledge on maintaining data privacy. Following a brief educational presentation reviewing data protection measures in this study (e.g., specifying data collected/not collected, instruction on deactivating collection of specific data elements), privacy concerns were re‐assessed. A 2 (Time; pre/post) x 2 (Condition; general/study‐specific) x 2 (Cognitive Status; cognitively‐normal/impaired) mixed model ANOVA analyzed the effect of the educational intervention on privacy concerns, and a 2 (Time) x 2 (Cognitive Status) mixed model ANOVA analyzed its effect on self‐perceived knowledge. Result In the privacy concern model, there was a significant within‐subjects effect of Condition, F (1,49)=13.69, p <.001, η p 2 =.22, with greater concern about general versus study‐specific data privacy. A significant Condition x Cognitive Status interaction, F (1,49)=4.16, p = .05, η p 2 =.08, indicated cognitively‐impaired participants endorsed lower concern about general privacy than cognitively‐normal participants. A significant main effect of Time, F (1,49)=23.62, p <.001, η p 2 = .33, indicated privacy concerns were reduced following the intervention. The remaining two‐ and three‐way interactions were not significant, p 's >.21. No significant main effects or interactions were found in the knowledge model, p 's >.09. Conclusion Older adults with and without cognitive impairment expressed greater confidence in their study‐related digital data privacy despite having general privacy concerns. A brief educational intervention effectively reduced participants’ privacy concerns. Results suggest educational efforts by research teams can attenuate digital data privacy concerns in older adults participating in ADRD digital monitoring studies. As digital tools are increasingly incorporated in ADRD studies, it is crucial researchers prioritize participants’ digital data privacy.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Southwestern Medical Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.