AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING IN ADMINISTRATIVE PENAL MATTERS

Automated decision-making in administrative punishment brings new challenges in the area of legal regulation and state responsibility. This article analyses the existing legal regulations that determine the conditions of liability for damage caused by artificial intelligence decisions in administrative law, with an emphasis on administrative punishment. Particular attention is paid to Act No. 514/2003 Coll. on liability for damage caused in the exercise of public authority and its applicability to cases of incorrect official procedures of systems using artificial intelligence. The paper also assesses the impact of European legislation, in particular the Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) and the GDPR, on liability relationships in public administration. The article also deals with mechanisms for judicial review of artificial intelligence decisions, the need for transparency and ethical issues of automated decisionmaking. It concludes by identifying key challenges and recommendations for the regulation of artificial intelligence in administrative punishment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
STUDIA IURIDICA Casoviensia
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33542/sic2025-s-07
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING IN ADMINISTRATIVE PENAL MATTERS

Alan Lengyel
STUDIA IURIDICA Casoviensia
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING IN ADMINISTRATIVE PENAL MATTERS

Alan Lengyel
article en

Abstract

Automated decision-making in administrative punishment brings new challenges in the area of legal regulation and state responsibility. This article analyses the existing legal regulations that determine the conditions of liability for damage caused by artificial intelligence decisions in administrative law, with an emphasis on administrative punishment. Particular attention is paid to Act No. 514/2003 Coll. on liability for damage caused in the exercise of public authority and its applicability to cases of incorrect official procedures of systems using artificial intelligence. The paper also assesses the impact of European legislation, in particular the Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) and the GDPR, on liability relationships in public administration. The article also deals with mechanisms for judicial review of artificial intelligence decisions, the need for transparency and ethical issues of automated decisionmaking. It concludes by identifying key challenges and recommendations for the regulation of artificial intelligence in administrative punishment.

STUDIA IURIDICA CasoviensiaVol. 13(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.