Building quality culture through accreditation: a PRECEDE-guided exploration of leadership in clinical units

Purpose This study aims to explore the perceptions of clinical management unit leaders regarding their role in healthcare accreditation processes within a European public hospital. It aims to identify the predisposing, enabling and reinforcing factors that shape leadership practices and influence the development of a quality-oriented organisational culture. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative hermeneutic approach was employed, combining individual and group semi-structured interviews and participant observation. Six healthcare professionals responsible for accreditation projects under the Andalusian Agency for Health Quality participated. Data were analysed using Ricoeur’s interpretative framework, guided by the PRECEDE model. Findings Three themes emerged in this study: (1) conceptual tensions between accreditation and quality culture, (2) leadership as a collective and emotionally demanding endeavour and (3) accreditation as a process that generates both tangible improvements and emotional reinforcement. The study highlights the need to clarify the internal lead’s role and align accreditation language with clinical and managerial realities. Research limitations/implications Future research could examine how gender dynamics influence leadership in accreditation processes. Practical implications Findings support the need for leadership development, institutional investment and the redesign of accreditation standards to better reflect clinical practice and managerial responsibilities. Social implications The study underscores the emotional and cultural impact of organisational change, highlighting the importance of supportive environments that foster shared responsibility, team engagement and sustainable quality improvement. Originality/value This is the first study to apply the PRECEDE model to explore leadership in accreditation. It offers a novel framework for understanding how internal leads navigate quality improvement within complex healthcare organisations and provides actionable insights for institutional development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhcqa-10-2025-0161
Primary Topic
Healthcare Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building quality culture through accreditation: a PRECEDE-guided exploration of leadership in clinical units

Víctor M. González‐Chordá, Pedro E. Ventura-Puertos, Manuel Rich-Ruiz, Maria Pilar Mesa-Blanco
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
Healthcare Quality and Management
article

Building quality culture through accreditation: a PRECEDE-guided exploration of leadership in clinical units

Víctor M. González‐Chordá, Pedro E. Ventura-Puertos, Manuel Rich-Ruiz, Maria Pilar Mesa-Blanco
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore the perceptions of clinical management unit leaders regarding their role in healthcare accreditation processes within a European public hospital. It aims to identify the predisposing, enabling and reinforcing factors that shape leadership practices and influence the development of a quality-oriented organisational culture. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative hermeneutic approach was employed, combining individual and group semi-structured interviews and participant observation. Six healthcare professionals responsible for accreditation projects under the Andalusian Agency for Health Quality participated. Data were analysed using Ricoeur’s interpretative framework, guided by the PRECEDE model. Findings Three themes emerged in this study: (1) conceptual tensions between accreditation and quality culture, (2) leadership as a collective and emotionally demanding endeavour and (3) accreditation as a process that generates both tangible improvements and emotional reinforcement. The study highlights the need to clarify the internal lead’s role and align accreditation language with clinical and managerial realities. Research limitations/implications Future research could examine how gender dynamics influence leadership in accreditation processes. Practical implications Findings support the need for leadership development, institutional investment and the redesign of accreditation standards to better reflect clinical practice and managerial responsibilities. Social implications The study underscores the emotional and cultural impact of organisational change, highlighting the importance of supportive environments that foster shared responsibility, team engagement and sustainable quality improvement. Originality/value This is the first study to apply the PRECEDE model to explore leadership in accreditation. It offers a novel framework for understanding how internal leads navigate quality improvement within complex healthcare organisations and provides actionable insights for institutional development.

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
Universitat Jaume I (ES), Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (ES), Unidad de Investigación en cuidados y servicios de salud (Investén-isciii) (ES), Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (ES), Triangle : Action, Discours, Pensée politique et économique (FR), Medical Research Network (US), Cordoba University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Healthcare Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.