Strengthening the rule of law: the necessity of protecting human rights defenders from criminalisation

Abstract This article draws an explicit and much needed connection between Human Rights Defenders (HRDs) and the principle of the rule of law, arguing that the growing criminalisation of HRDs undermines the rule of law, especially in liberal states that claim to uphold strong rule of law commitments. HRDs are central to promoting human rights, exposing injustice, challenging discrimination and corruption, and pushing for accountability. When they are criminalized, their ability to carry out this work is severely restricted, creating a downward spiral: criminalisation weakens the rule of law, which in turn enables further repression and legal decline. The article addresses a gap in the existing literature by bringing together work on the rule of law with scholarship on HRDs and their criminalisation. It adopts both doctrinal and socio-legal methods and engages with feminist and post-colonial critiques to argue that HRDs operate within, and promote, a substantive understanding of the rule of law grounded in justice, equality, and human rights. The article concludes by arguing for resistance to the criminalisation of HRDs and outlies social and institutional strategies to support HRDs and strengthen the rule of law.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Rights Law Review
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaf039
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strengthening the rule of law: the necessity of protecting human rights defenders from criminalisation

Aikaterini Christina Koula
Human Rights Law Review
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Strengthening the rule of law: the necessity of protecting human rights defenders from criminalisation

Aikaterini Christina Koula
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article draws an explicit and much needed connection between Human Rights Defenders (HRDs) and the principle of the rule of law, arguing that the growing criminalisation of HRDs undermines the rule of law, especially in liberal states that claim to uphold strong rule of law commitments. HRDs are central to promoting human rights, exposing injustice, challenging discrimination and corruption, and pushing for accountability. When they are criminalized, their ability to carry out this work is severely restricted, creating a downward spiral: criminalisation weakens the rule of law, which in turn enables further repression and legal decline. The article addresses a gap in the existing literature by bringing together work on the rule of law with scholarship on HRDs and their criminalisation. It adopts both doctrinal and socio-legal methods and engages with feminist and post-colonial critiques to argue that HRDs operate within, and promote, a substantive understanding of the rule of law grounded in justice, equality, and human rights. The article concludes by arguing for resistance to the criminalisation of HRDs and outlies social and institutional strategies to support HRDs and strengthen the rule of law.

Human Rights Law ReviewVol. 26(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.