STPA-based approach to identifying extraneous errors of commission in FOAK advanced reactors

First-of-a-kind (FOAK) advanced nuclear reactors, including small modular reactors, increasingly rely on autonomous safety systems to achieve high levels of safety and efficiency. While such designs reduce the need for manual intervention, they also introduce new complexities in supervisory control that may lead to errors of commission (EOCs). In particular, extraneous EOCs, referring to operator actions that are unnecessary and potentially hazardous, have not been systematically addressed by conventional human reliability analysis methods. This study investigates the feasibility of applying Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) to systematically identify extraneous EOCs in autonomous safety contexts. An application to a fail-safe passive safety system demonstrates how STPA can trace the causal mechanisms of inappropriate operator interventions, revealing loss scenarios and pathways specific to extraneous EOCs. Beyond this methodological validation, the study derives example requirements to support safe interaction between autonomous safety functions and human operators. These requirements illustrate how STPA results can be translated into general guidance for ensuring that human–automation interactions preserve system safety while accommodating supervisory flexibility. In doing so, the proposed approach extends the analytical scope of human reliability methods and provides a structured foundation for managing operator–system dynamics in FOAK advanced reactors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2026.104130
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STPA-based approach to identifying extraneous errors of commission in FOAK advanced reactors

Yochan Kim, J. Park, Jinkyun Park, Sung-Min Shin
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

STPA-based approach to identifying extraneous errors of commission in FOAK advanced reactors

Yochan Kim, J. Park, Jinkyun Park, Sung-Min Shin
article en

Abstract

First-of-a-kind (FOAK) advanced nuclear reactors, including small modular reactors, increasingly rely on autonomous safety systems to achieve high levels of safety and efficiency. While such designs reduce the need for manual intervention, they also introduce new complexities in supervisory control that may lead to errors of commission (EOCs). In particular, extraneous EOCs, referring to operator actions that are unnecessary and potentially hazardous, have not been systematically addressed by conventional human reliability analysis methods. This study investigates the feasibility of applying Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) to systematically identify extraneous EOCs in autonomous safety contexts. An application to a fail-safe passive safety system demonstrates how STPA can trace the causal mechanisms of inappropriate operator interventions, revealing loss scenarios and pathways specific to extraneous EOCs. Beyond this methodological validation, the study derives example requirements to support safe interaction between autonomous safety functions and human operators. These requirements illustrate how STPA results can be translated into general guidance for ensuring that human–automation interactions preserve system safety while accommodating supervisory flexibility. In doing so, the proposed approach extends the analytical scope of human reliability methods and provides a structured foundation for managing operator–system dynamics in FOAK advanced reactors.

Nuclear Engineering and TechnologyVol. 58(5)
Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.