Does the use of intermediate abutments impact screw-retained implant-supported fixed partial prostheses outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Objectives To evaluate the impact of intermediate abutments on screw-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), primarily assessing marginal bone loss (MBL) and secondarily probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BoP), implant survival, mechanical complications, and patient satisfaction.Data Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous outcomes and risk differences for dichotomous outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and the certainty of evidence (CoE) using the GRADE approach.Sources A systematic search was conducted up to May 2025 across MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar.Study Selection Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with ≥6 months of follow-up comparing abutment-level (AL) versus implant-level (IL) connections in partially edentulous patients rehabilitated with screw-retained FDPs.Results Three RCTs (8 publications) with different follow-up periods, involving a total of 126 patients and 341 implants, were included. A statistically significant reduction in MBL was observed at 36 months at implant level (MD:-0.13 mm; 95% CI: -0.23 to -0.03; p=0.01; 2 RCTs; 162 implants; moderate CoE). No significant differences in MBL were observed at 12 or 60 months. PD was significantly reduced in the AL group at 36 months (MD:-0.66 mm; 95% CI: -1.13 to -0.19; p=0.01; 2 RCTs; 187 implants; low CoE) and at 60 months (MD:-0.60 mm; 95% CI: -0.91 to -0.29; p<0.001; 1 RCT; 115 implants; low CoE). No significant differences were found in BoP, implant survival, mechanical complications, or patient satisfaction at any follow-up time point.Conclusions Intermediate abutments may improve soft-tissue health by reducing PD without increasing complications or implant failure. Despite a minor, non-clinically relevant reduction in MBL, they remain a viable option for screw-retained FDPs.Clinical Relevance Intermediate abutments slightly reduce probing depth and marginal bone loss in multi-unit implant prostheses, but the clinical impact is minimal, with no effect on implant survival or mechanical complications.Prospero Registration CRD42023475778.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/93624
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the use of intermediate abutments impact screw-retained implant-supported fixed partial prostheses outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Andrea Roccuzzo, María Antonia Menini, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Pedro Molinero-Mourelle et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Does the use of intermediate abutments impact screw-retained implant-supported fixed partial prostheses outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Andrea Roccuzzo, María Antonia Menini, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Pedro Molinero-Mourelle, Paolo PESCE, Alvaro Limones, Gabriela Panca Sabatini
article en

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the impact of intermediate abutments on screw-retained implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), primarily assessing marginal bone loss (MBL) and secondarily probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BoP), implant survival, mechanical complications, and patient satisfaction.Data Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous outcomes and risk differences for dichotomous outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and the certainty of evidence (CoE) using the GRADE approach.Sources A systematic search was conducted up to May 2025 across MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar.Study Selection Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with ≥6 months of follow-up comparing abutment-level (AL) versus implant-level (IL) connections in partially edentulous patients rehabilitated with screw-retained FDPs.Results Three RCTs (8 publications) with different follow-up periods, involving a total of 126 patients and 341 implants, were included. A statistically significant reduction in MBL was observed at 36 months at implant level (MD:-0.13 mm; 95% CI: -0.23 to -0.03; p=0.01; 2 RCTs; 162 implants; moderate CoE). No significant differences in MBL were observed at 12 or 60 months. PD was significantly reduced in the AL group at 36 months (MD:-0.66 mm; 95% CI: -1.13 to -0.19; p=0.01; 2 RCTs; 187 implants; low CoE) and at 60 months (MD:-0.60 mm; 95% CI: -0.91 to -0.29; p<0.001; 1 RCT; 115 implants; low CoE). No significant differences were found in BoP, implant survival, mechanical complications, or patient satisfaction at any follow-up time point.Conclusions Intermediate abutments may improve soft-tissue health by reducing PD without increasing complications or implant failure. Despite a minor, non-clinically relevant reduction in MBL, they remain a viable option for screw-retained FDPs.Clinical Relevance Intermediate abutments slightly reduce probing depth and marginal bone loss in multi-unit implant prostheses, but the clinical impact is minimal, with no effect on implant survival or mechanical complications.Prospero Registration CRD42023475778.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
University of Dental Medicine (MM)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.