Stakeholder perceptions of corporate social responsibility in sustainable food systems: a systematic review

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) can shape sustainable food systems, yet stakeholder perceptions vary across contexts. This systematic review synthesises empirical evidence on how stakeholders interpret and evaluate CSR in sustainable food systems, the impacts associated with these perceptions, and whether findings converge across national settings. We searched Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection through 29 June 2025 for peer-reviewed empirical studies published in 2015–2025 (English; full text). A total of 37 studies from 22 countries met the inclusion criteria. Most studies used quantitative surveys and focused on consumers, while producers, distributors, retailers, non-governmental organisations, and policymakers were examined less often. Recurrent themes include health and environmental concerns, the intention–behaviour gap, and the roles of trust, labelling, and certification in shaping responses to CSR, alongside cross-cultural variation linked to institutional context. Limitations include English-only coverage, regional imbalance, narrow stakeholder coverage in primary studies, and heavy reliance on survey designs. Study quality was considered using CASP/MMAT. Overall, stakeholder perceptions influence the uptake and effectiveness of CSR in food markets. Implications point to transparent disclosure, clear and verifiable labelling, third-party assurance, and more inclusive, context-sensitive research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Food & Agriculture
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2025.2609338
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholder perceptions of corporate social responsibility in sustainable food systems: a systematic review

Kailai Zhang, Mohamad Reevany Bustami
Cogent Food & Agriculture
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Stakeholder perceptions of corporate social responsibility in sustainable food systems: a systematic review

Kailai Zhang, Mohamad Reevany Bustami
article en

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) can shape sustainable food systems, yet stakeholder perceptions vary across contexts. This systematic review synthesises empirical evidence on how stakeholders interpret and evaluate CSR in sustainable food systems, the impacts associated with these perceptions, and whether findings converge across national settings. We searched Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection through 29 June 2025 for peer-reviewed empirical studies published in 2015–2025 (English; full text). A total of 37 studies from 22 countries met the inclusion criteria. Most studies used quantitative surveys and focused on consumers, while producers, distributors, retailers, non-governmental organisations, and policymakers were examined less often. Recurrent themes include health and environmental concerns, the intention–behaviour gap, and the roles of trust, labelling, and certification in shaping responses to CSR, alongside cross-cultural variation linked to institutional context. Limitations include English-only coverage, regional imbalance, narrow stakeholder coverage in primary studies, and heavy reliance on survey designs. Study quality was considered using CASP/MMAT. Overall, stakeholder perceptions influence the uptake and effectiveness of CSR in food markets. Implications point to transparent disclosure, clear and verifiable labelling, third-party assurance, and more inclusive, context-sensitive research.

Cogent Food & AgricultureVol. 12(1)
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.