Effect of Race and Tumor Subsite on Survival Outcome in Early- and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer

<b>Background</b>: While colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality have declined among patients aged ≥50 years (late-onset), rates are increasing in those aged <50 years (early-onset). Historically, non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) have had better 5-year survival compared with non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB), and rectal cancer has had better outcomes than colon cancer. Whether these disparities by race and tumor location are evident for both early-onset (EOCRC) and late-onset (LOCRC) CRC remains unclear. <b>Methods</b>: CRC cases diagnosed from 2011 to 2022 were identified from the Louisiana Tumor Registry. EOCRC was defined as diagnoses at ages 20-49 years, and LOCRC was defined as diagnoses at ages ≥50 years. Racial groups included NHW and NHB; tumor location was categorized as proximal colon, distal colon, or rectum. Cox regression was used to assess unadjusted and adjusted overall and cancer-specific survival. <b>Results</b>: Of 23,738 CRC patients, 10.7% were diagnosed at age <50 years. Compared to LOCRC, EOCRC patients included a higher proportion of NHB (37.5% vs. 32.6%) and rectal tumors (44.4% vs. 29.9%). NHB had worse overall survival than NHW in early-onset distal colon cancer (adjusted HR [aHR] = 1.358; 95%CI: 1.024-1.801). Conversely, NHB had better overall (aHR = 0.899; 95%CI: 0.831-0.973) and cancer-specific survival (aHR = 0.873; 95%CI: 0.793-0.960) in late-onset rectal cancer. Among EOCRC NHW, proximal tumors were associated with worse overall (aHR = 1.407; 95%CI: 1.102-1.796) and cancer-specific survival (aHR = 1.379; 95%CI: 1.057-1.799) compared with distal tumors. <b>Conclusions:</b> Survival differences by race and tumor subsite are observed between EOCRC and LOCRC, with NHB showing a lower hazard of death in some LOCRC subgroups. These findings highlight the need to consider the age of onset and tumor location when addressing racial disparities in CRC outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020180
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Race and Tumor Subsite on Survival Outcome in Early- and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer

Muhammed Jawla, Batsirai Mabvakure, Elena M. Stoffel, Kristen S. Purrington et al.
Cancers
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Effect of Race and Tumor Subsite on Survival Outcome in Early- and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer

Muhammed Jawla, Batsirai Mabvakure, Elena M. Stoffel, Kristen S. Purrington, Laura S. Rozek, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Siddhi Patil, Jaeil Ahn, Shengdi Wen, Mei-Chin Hsieh
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: While colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality have declined among patients aged ≥50 years (late-onset), rates are increasing in those aged <50 years (early-onset). Historically, non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) have had better 5-year survival compared with non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB), and rectal cancer has had better outcomes than colon cancer. Whether these disparities by race and tumor location are evident for both early-onset (EOCRC) and late-onset (LOCRC) CRC remains unclear. <b>Methods</b>: CRC cases diagnosed from 2011 to 2022 were identified from the Louisiana Tumor Registry. EOCRC was defined as diagnoses at ages 20-49 years, and LOCRC was defined as diagnoses at ages ≥50 years. Racial groups included NHW and NHB; tumor location was categorized as proximal colon, distal colon, or rectum. Cox regression was used to assess unadjusted and adjusted overall and cancer-specific survival. <b>Results</b>: Of 23,738 CRC patients, 10.7% were diagnosed at age <50 years. Compared to LOCRC, EOCRC patients included a higher proportion of NHB (37.5% vs. 32.6%) and rectal tumors (44.4% vs. 29.9%). NHB had worse overall survival than NHW in early-onset distal colon cancer (adjusted HR [aHR] = 1.358; 95%CI: 1.024-1.801). Conversely, NHB had better overall (aHR = 0.899; 95%CI: 0.831-0.973) and cancer-specific survival (aHR = 0.873; 95%CI: 0.793-0.960) in late-onset rectal cancer. Among EOCRC NHW, proximal tumors were associated with worse overall (aHR = 1.407; 95%CI: 1.102-1.796) and cancer-specific survival (aHR = 1.379; 95%CI: 1.057-1.799) compared with distal tumors. <b>Conclusions:</b> Survival differences by race and tumor subsite are observed between EOCRC and LOCRC, with NHB showing a lower hazard of death in some LOCRC subgroups. These findings highlight the need to consider the age of onset and tumor location when addressing racial disparities in CRC outcomes.

CancersVol. 18(2)
Georgetown University (US), Wayne State University (US), University of Michigan (US), Georgetown University Medical Center (US), Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.