Adoption of artificial intelligence in primary health care: systematic synthesis of stakeholder perspectives

Primary care, the cornerstone of healthcare systems, faces increasing pressures from aging populations, chronic diseases, and resource constraints. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers transformative potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, streamline workflows, and improve patient outcomes. However, its integration into primary care is challenged by technical, ethical, and organizational barriers. This systematic review examines AI’s role in primary care, focusing on stakeholder perspectives and implementation dynamics. A systematic synthesis of qualitative studies was conducted following Noblit and Hare’s framework and Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis. Searches spanned PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and grey literature (2015–2025), identifying qualitative studies on AI in primary care. Studies were screened using predefined criteria, with quality assessed via the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Data were extracted systematically and synthesized, with initial search for 1416 studies. Finally, 23 studies from diverse regions (e.g., UK, USA, Australia, Cameroon) and involving stakeholders like physicians, patients, and policymakers were included. Six themes emerged: Barriers (technical, organizational, policy, knowledge, cultural), Facilitators (benefits, trust, support systems, evidence), Impact on Healthcare Delivery (workflow, decision-making, roles, engagement), Ethical/Legal/Social Implications (privacy, accountability, equity, public perception), Stakeholder Perspectives, and Future Directions. AI improved efficiency and diagnostics but faced challenges like data quality, trust deficits, and ethical concerns. AI holds significant promise for transforming primary care by enhancing efficiency and patient care, but its adoption is hindered by multifaceted barriers from stakeholder perspectives. Transparent AI systems, robust training, and ethical frameworks are crucial to build trust and ensure equity. Future research should focus on longitudinal impacts and inclusive strategies to align AI with primary care’s patient-centered ethos.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Primary Care
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-03157-6
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adoption of artificial intelligence in primary health care: systematic synthesis of stakeholder perspectives

Somayeh Fallah, Hadi Sabat Sani, Mohammadamin Jandaghian-Bidgoli, Masoumeh Mobaraki et al.
BMC Primary Care
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Adoption of artificial intelligence in primary health care: systematic synthesis of stakeholder perspectives

Somayeh Fallah, Hadi Sabat Sani, Mohammadamin Jandaghian-Bidgoli, Masoumeh Mobaraki, Atefeh Sholibor, Fatemeh Abdi, Mohammad Hasannezhad
article en

Abstract

Primary care, the cornerstone of healthcare systems, faces increasing pressures from aging populations, chronic diseases, and resource constraints. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers transformative potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, streamline workflows, and improve patient outcomes. However, its integration into primary care is challenged by technical, ethical, and organizational barriers. This systematic review examines AI’s role in primary care, focusing on stakeholder perspectives and implementation dynamics. A systematic synthesis of qualitative studies was conducted following Noblit and Hare’s framework and Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis. Searches spanned PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and grey literature (2015–2025), identifying qualitative studies on AI in primary care. Studies were screened using predefined criteria, with quality assessed via the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Data were extracted systematically and synthesized, with initial search for 1416 studies. Finally, 23 studies from diverse regions (e.g., UK, USA, Australia, Cameroon) and involving stakeholders like physicians, patients, and policymakers were included. Six themes emerged: Barriers (technical, organizational, policy, knowledge, cultural), Facilitators (benefits, trust, support systems, evidence), Impact on Healthcare Delivery (workflow, decision-making, roles, engagement), Ethical/Legal/Social Implications (privacy, accountability, equity, public perception), Stakeholder Perspectives, and Future Directions. AI improved efficiency and diagnostics but faced challenges like data quality, trust deficits, and ethical concerns. AI holds significant promise for transforming primary care by enhancing efficiency and patient care, but its adoption is hindered by multifaceted barriers from stakeholder perspectives. Transparent AI systems, robust training, and ethical frameworks are crucial to build trust and ensure equity. Future research should focus on longitudinal impacts and inclusive strategies to align AI with primary care’s patient-centered ethos.

BMC Primary CareVol. 27(1)
Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tarbiat Modares University (IR), Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Edinburgh Napier University (GB), Iranshahr University (IR), Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.