AI writing tools in English writing: Reviewing teachers' and students’ views on benefits and concerns

The present narrative review synthesizes the teachers' and learners' positive and negative perspectives regarding the use of AI tools in English writing within EFL/ESL contexts. The methodology follows an inclusion-exclusion criterion with a PRISMA flow diagram. A total of 28 peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025 were included from the SCOPUS/Web of Science (27) and Google Scholar (1) databases. For deductive thematic analysis, a combined framework consisting of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), Self-Regulated Learning (SLR), and Vygotsky's scaffolding theory is utilized as lenses. This study predefines ten positive themes as well as two negative themes. In the findings section, the study narrates the themes, like the pedagogical benefits of AI tools, including enhanced feedback, goal-setting, and student motivation, along with challenges such as over-reliance on AI and ethical concerns. • AI tools enhance goal-setting and motivation in writing tasks. • AI support fosters student self-regulation and improves task planning. • Excessive reliance on AI tools may reduce students' independent writing skills. • Unethical use of AI raises concerns about academic integrity. • AI provides cognitive scaffolding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102437
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
192.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI writing tools in English writing: Reviewing teachers' and students’ views on benefits and concerns

Firoz Akanda, Tasnia Talukder
1 citations
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Writing and Handwriting Education
192.69
article

AI writing tools in English writing: Reviewing teachers' and students’ views on benefits and concerns

Firoz Akanda, Tasnia Talukder
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The present narrative review synthesizes the teachers' and learners' positive and negative perspectives regarding the use of AI tools in English writing within EFL/ESL contexts. The methodology follows an inclusion-exclusion criterion with a PRISMA flow diagram. A total of 28 peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025 were included from the SCOPUS/Web of Science (27) and Google Scholar (1) databases. For deductive thematic analysis, a combined framework consisting of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), Self-Regulated Learning (SLR), and Vygotsky's scaffolding theory is utilized as lenses. This study predefines ten positive themes as well as two negative themes. In the findings section, the study narrates the themes, like the pedagogical benefits of AI tools, including enhanced feedback, goal-setting, and student motivation, along with challenges such as over-reliance on AI and ethical concerns. • AI tools enhance goal-setting and motivation in writing tasks. • AI support fosters student self-regulation and improves task planning. • Excessive reliance on AI tools may reduce students' independent writing skills. • Unethical use of AI raises concerns about academic integrity. • AI provides cognitive scaffolding.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 13
International University of Business Agriculture and Technology (BD)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Writing and Handwriting Education
192.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI writing tools in English writing: Reviewing teachers' and students’ views on benefits and concerns — Firoz Akanda, Tasnia Talukder · Social Sciences & Humanities Open (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS