Prioritizing patient‐centered research in adult congenital heart disease and pregnancy: Findings from Phase 3 of a multiphase national initiative

Abstract Background Despite advancements in care, pregnant individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) face disproportionately high risks. Objectives To address these challenges, a national consortium was established to improve maternal outcomes in CHD through multidisciplinary collaboration and patient engagement. Study design As part of a 2.5‐year multi‐phase consortium initiative, an in‐person research summit followed by three virtual focus groups (Project PHASE 3) was conducted with patients, clinicians, researchers, advocates, and policy representatives. Qualitative data were collected, and reflexive thematic analysis was performed to identify shared priorities. Results A total of 48 individuals participated in the in‐person meeting, including 18 patients (83% female; 11% Black/African American, 17% Asian, 11% Hispanic, 61% White) and 30 clinicians/researchers. An additional 19 patients (100% female; 32% rural/non‐urban; 16% Black/African American, 10% Hispanic, 74% White) participated in virtual focus groups. Key priorities identified included improved patient–healthcare provider communication, expanded access to multidisciplinary and adult CHD‐specialized care, and greater inclusion of patient voices in reproductive planning and research. Focus groups underscored racial disparities in care, limited CHD education for patients of color, and the need for culturally tailored resources. Participants emphasized the importance of representative research cohorts, integration of genetic counseling, and dissemination of research in accessible, plain‐language formats. Conclusions Findings demonstrate the value of integrating patient expertise and partnership in shaping cardio‐obstetric research, care models, and education. Addressing maternal health concerns in CHD research requires both structural changes and community‐driven, inclusive research strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pregnancy
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70215
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prioritizing patient‐centered research in adult congenital heart disease and pregnancy: Findings from Phase 3 of a multiphase national initiative

Michael G. Earing, Wayne Franklin, Melissa L. Russo, Jennifer Cortes et al.
1 citations
Pregnancy
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
31.52
article

Prioritizing patient‐centered research in adult congenital heart disease and pregnancy: Findings from Phase 3 of a multiphase national initiative

Michael G. Earing, Wayne Franklin, Melissa L. Russo, Jennifer Cortes, Rohan D’Souza, Mindi Messmer, Scott Leezer, Anitha S. John, Jamie L. Jackson, Ayesha Abusbeitan, Ruth Phillippi, Kashvi Singh, Yonitan Buber, Katia Bravo‐James
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite advancements in care, pregnant individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) face disproportionately high risks. Objectives To address these challenges, a national consortium was established to improve maternal outcomes in CHD through multidisciplinary collaboration and patient engagement. Study design As part of a 2.5‐year multi‐phase consortium initiative, an in‐person research summit followed by three virtual focus groups (Project PHASE 3) was conducted with patients, clinicians, researchers, advocates, and policy representatives. Qualitative data were collected, and reflexive thematic analysis was performed to identify shared priorities. Results A total of 48 individuals participated in the in‐person meeting, including 18 patients (83% female; 11% Black/African American, 17% Asian, 11% Hispanic, 61% White) and 30 clinicians/researchers. An additional 19 patients (100% female; 32% rural/non‐urban; 16% Black/African American, 10% Hispanic, 74% White) participated in virtual focus groups. Key priorities identified included improved patient–healthcare provider communication, expanded access to multidisciplinary and adult CHD‐specialized care, and greater inclusion of patient voices in reproductive planning and research. Focus groups underscored racial disparities in care, limited CHD education for patients of color, and the need for culturally tailored resources. Participants emphasized the importance of representative research cohorts, integration of genetic counseling, and dissemination of research in accessible, plain‐language formats. Conclusions Findings demonstrate the value of integrating patient expertise and partnership in shaping cardio‐obstetric research, care models, and education. Addressing maternal health concerns in CHD research requires both structural changes and community‐driven, inclusive research strategies.

PregnancyVol. 2(1)
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), Children's National (US), University of Washington (US), Brown University (US), Jacksonville College (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US), Adult Congenital Heart Association (US), Health Strat (Kenya) (KE), McMaster University (CA)
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
31.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.