Evaluation of microphysics and boundary layer schemes for simulating extreme rainfall events over Saudi Arabia using WRF-ARW

Abstract. Extreme Rainfall Events (EREs) and resulting flash floods in Saudi Arabia pose major threats, frequently causing fatalities and significant economic losses. Accurate ERE simulations are crucial for weather forecasting, climate change assessment, and disaster management. This study evaluates planetary boundary layer (PBL) and cloud microphysics (MP) schemes to simulate EREs in the Arabian Peninsula (AP) using the Advanced Research version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF-ARW) model V4.4. Thirty-six combinations of four PBL and nine MP schemes were tested across 17 EREs at a convection-permitting 3 km resolution and compared with IMERG gridded satellite data for rainfall and station observations for temperature, humidity, and wind speed. The Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE), which incorporates correlation, variability, and bias, was used as performance metric. We found a good agreement between observed and simulated rainfall patterns, though some over- and underestimations were present. Among the PBL schemes, Yonsei University (YSU; BL1) tended to perform best in terms of rainfall, while Thompson (MP8) ranked the highest among the MP schemes. Goddard (MP7) also delivered strong results. Among all 36 combinations, the Thompson-YSU (MP8_BL1) combination produced the highest mean KGE across the 17 EREs for rainfall, performing statistically significantly better than 21 other combinations. While MP8_BL1 also performed best for the other three meteorological variables, performance rankings varied across variables, likely because different physical processes govern the simulation of different variables. This study highlights the complexity of scheme evaluation and the importance of analyzing multiple EREs with high-quality reference data. The results offer practical guidance for scheme selection and lay the foundation for improving ERE forecasting and regional climate modeling over the AP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-21-2026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
40.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of microphysics and boundary layer schemes for simulating extreme rainfall events over Saudi Arabia using WRF-ARW

Hamza Kunhu Bangalath, Hylke E. Beck, Paul A. Kucera, Rajesh Kumar Sahu et al.
1 citations
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
40.64
article

Evaluation of microphysics and boundary layer schemes for simulating extreme rainfall events over Saudi Arabia using WRF-ARW

Hamza Kunhu Bangalath, Hylke E. Beck, Paul A. Kucera, Rajesh Kumar Sahu, Suleiman Mostamandi, Jason Evans
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Extreme Rainfall Events (EREs) and resulting flash floods in Saudi Arabia pose major threats, frequently causing fatalities and significant economic losses. Accurate ERE simulations are crucial for weather forecasting, climate change assessment, and disaster management. This study evaluates planetary boundary layer (PBL) and cloud microphysics (MP) schemes to simulate EREs in the Arabian Peninsula (AP) using the Advanced Research version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF-ARW) model V4.4. Thirty-six combinations of four PBL and nine MP schemes were tested across 17 EREs at a convection-permitting 3 km resolution and compared with IMERG gridded satellite data for rainfall and station observations for temperature, humidity, and wind speed. The Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE), which incorporates correlation, variability, and bias, was used as performance metric. We found a good agreement between observed and simulated rainfall patterns, though some over- and underestimations were present. Among the PBL schemes, Yonsei University (YSU; BL1) tended to perform best in terms of rainfall, while Thompson (MP8) ranked the highest among the MP schemes. Goddard (MP7) also delivered strong results. Among all 36 combinations, the Thompson-YSU (MP8_BL1) combination produced the highest mean KGE across the 17 EREs for rainfall, performing statistically significantly better than 21 other combinations. While MP8_BL1 also performed best for the other three meteorological variables, performance rankings varied across variables, likely because different physical processes govern the simulation of different variables. This study highlights the complexity of scheme evaluation and the importance of analyzing multiple EREs with high-quality reference data. The results offer practical guidance for scheme selection and lay the foundation for improving ERE forecasting and regional climate modeling over the AP.

Natural hazards and earth system sciencesVol. 26(1)
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (US), UNSW Sydney (AU), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, University of Wyoming, Iowa State University, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
40.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.