The Use and Perceptions of AI Chatbots in Medical Research: An International Cross-Sectional Survey

Background Artificial Intelligence (AI) has undergone remarkable progress, leading to the development of advanced large language models (LLMs). Despite these LLMs' growing adoption, concerns persist regarding the scientific accuracy of AI-generated content, and their acceptance within academic publishing remains contentious. This study aimed to describe AI-chatbot use patterns and to assess medical researchers' perceptions of impact on research credibility, ethical concerns, guideline awareness, and disclosure of future intentions. Methodology A cross-sectional survey-based study spread into Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Tunis, and England from 2023 to 2024 surveyed researchers, excluding non-medical and non-publishing researchers. Results We analyzed 434 respondents; 175 (40.3%) reported AI-chatbot use. Use varied by country (32.8%-45.9%), but neither gender nor country was significantly associated with use. Older age and more senior roles were associated with lower odds of use (odds ratio (OR): ages 41-50 years, 0.32; residents, 0.31; consultants, 0.17; <i>P</i> ≤ 0.009). Awareness strongly predicted use (OR 15.53), as did guideline awareness (OR 2.47), trust (<i>P</i> = 0.005), hypothesis formation (<i>P</i> = 0.001), willingness to cite (<i>P</i> = 0.003), and future use (<i>P</i> < 0.001); intention to declare use during submission did not differ (<i>P</i> = 0.468). Conclusions Our study shows that medical researchers have a positive attitude toward using AI chatbots, but with ethical and accuracy concerns requiring further interventions to create systematic unified rules.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.100908
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Use and Perceptions of AI Chatbots in Medical Research: An International Cross-Sectional Survey

Talha Shahzad, Fatma Z Kefi, Hassan Mohammed Alturaiki, Hassan Alradhi et al.
Cureus
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

The Use and Perceptions of AI Chatbots in Medical Research: An International Cross-Sectional Survey

Talha Shahzad, Fatma Z Kefi, Hassan Mohammed Alturaiki, Hassan Alradhi, Ghadeer A Alali, Mujtaba M Al Khamees, Abdullah Husain H Al Ramadan, Fadila Bello, Ohud T Alharbi
article en

Abstract

Background Artificial Intelligence (AI) has undergone remarkable progress, leading to the development of advanced large language models (LLMs). Despite these LLMs' growing adoption, concerns persist regarding the scientific accuracy of AI-generated content, and their acceptance within academic publishing remains contentious. This study aimed to describe AI-chatbot use patterns and to assess medical researchers' perceptions of impact on research credibility, ethical concerns, guideline awareness, and disclosure of future intentions. Methodology A cross-sectional survey-based study spread into Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Tunis, and England from 2023 to 2024 surveyed researchers, excluding non-medical and non-publishing researchers. Results We analyzed 434 respondents; 175 (40.3%) reported AI-chatbot use. Use varied by country (32.8%-45.9%), but neither gender nor country was significantly associated with use. Older age and more senior roles were associated with lower odds of use (odds ratio (OR): ages 41-50 years, 0.32; residents, 0.31; consultants, 0.17; <i>P</i> ≤ 0.009). Awareness strongly predicted use (OR 15.53), as did guideline awareness (OR 2.47), trust (<i>P</i> = 0.005), hypothesis formation (<i>P</i> = 0.001), willingness to cite (<i>P</i> = 0.003), and future use (<i>P</i> < 0.001); intention to declare use during submission did not differ (<i>P</i> = 0.468). Conclusions Our study shows that medical researchers have a positive attitude toward using AI chatbots, but with ethical and accuracy concerns requiring further interventions to create systematic unified rules.

CureusVol. 18(1)
University of Lancashire (GB), Sarojini Naidu Medical College (IN), King Fahd Medical City (SA), Qatif Central Hospital (SA), Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital (NG), King Fahad Hospital Hufūf (SA), King Faisal University (SA), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.