Health inequalities in risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in England’s second wave: population-based cross-sectional analysis from the REACT-1 study

Objectives The rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection caused high levels of hospitalisation and deaths in late 2020 and early 2021 during the second wave in England. COVID-19 disease during this period was associated with marked health inequalities across ethnic and sociodemographic subgroups. In this paper, we aim to investigate and quantify inequalities in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection across ethnic and sociodemographic subgroups during a key period before widespread vaccination, thereby identifying the populations that bore a disproportionate burden of risk. Methods We analysed risk factors for test-positivity for SARS-CoV-2, based on self-administered throat and nose swabs in the community during rounds 5–10 of the REal-time Assessment of Community Transmission-1 (REACT-1) study between 18 September 2020 and 30 March 2021. Results Compared with the White ethnicity, people of Asian and the Black ethnicity had a higher risk of infection during rounds 5–10, with odds of 1.45 (1.27, 1.66) and 1.34 (1.11, 1.63), respectively, adjusted for demographic factors including age, sex, region, key work status, ethnicity and deprivation. Among ethnic subgroups, the highest and the second-highest odds were found in Bangladeshi and Pakistani participants at 3.28 (2.24, 4.80) and 2.12 (1.70, 2.64), respectively, when compared with the White British participants. People in larger (compared with smaller) households had higher odds of infection. Healthcare workers with direct patient contact and care home workers showed higher odds of infection compared with other essential/key workers. Additionally, the odds of infection among participants in public-facing activities or settings were greater than among those not working in those activities or settings. Conclusion Our findings highlight the differences in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a global north population during a period when the risk of infection was high, and there were substantial levels of social mixing. Planning for future waves of severe respiratory pathogens should include policies to reduce inequality in the risk of infection by ethnicity, household size and occupational activity in order to reduce inequality in disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Public Health
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2025-002596
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health inequalities in risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in England’s second wave: population-based cross-sectional analysis from the REACT-1 study

Christl Ann Donnelly, Claudio Fronterrè, David Haw, Christina Joanne Atchison et al.
BMJ Public Health
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Health inequalities in risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in England’s second wave: population-based cross-sectional analysis from the REACT-1 study

Christl Ann Donnelly, Claudio Fronterrè, David Haw, Christina Joanne Atchison, Ara Wardkes Darzi, Peter J. Diggle, Caroline E. Walters, Deborah Ashby, Haowei Wang, Helen L. Ward, Steven Riley, Oliver Eales, Graham S Cooke, Kylie E. C. Ainslie, Paul Elliott
article en

Abstract

Objectives The rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection caused high levels of hospitalisation and deaths in late 2020 and early 2021 during the second wave in England. COVID-19 disease during this period was associated with marked health inequalities across ethnic and sociodemographic subgroups. In this paper, we aim to investigate and quantify inequalities in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection across ethnic and sociodemographic subgroups during a key period before widespread vaccination, thereby identifying the populations that bore a disproportionate burden of risk. Methods We analysed risk factors for test-positivity for SARS-CoV-2, based on self-administered throat and nose swabs in the community during rounds 5–10 of the REal-time Assessment of Community Transmission-1 (REACT-1) study between 18 September 2020 and 30 March 2021. Results Compared with the White ethnicity, people of Asian and the Black ethnicity had a higher risk of infection during rounds 5–10, with odds of 1.45 (1.27, 1.66) and 1.34 (1.11, 1.63), respectively, adjusted for demographic factors including age, sex, region, key work status, ethnicity and deprivation. Among ethnic subgroups, the highest and the second-highest odds were found in Bangladeshi and Pakistani participants at 3.28 (2.24, 4.80) and 2.12 (1.70, 2.64), respectively, when compared with the White British participants. People in larger (compared with smaller) households had higher odds of infection. Healthcare workers with direct patient contact and care home workers showed higher odds of infection compared with other essential/key workers. Additionally, the odds of infection among participants in public-facing activities or settings were greater than among those not working in those activities or settings. Conclusion Our findings highlight the differences in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a global north population during a period when the risk of infection was high, and there were substantial levels of social mixing. Planning for future waves of severe respiratory pathogens should include policies to reduce inequality in the risk of infection by ethnicity, household size and occupational activity in order to reduce inequality in disease.

BMJ Public HealthVol. 4(1)
University of Liverpool (GB), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), University of Oxford (GB), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), Health Data Research UK (GB), MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London (GB), Lancaster University (GB)
Wellcome Trust, Government of the United Kingdom, National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit, National Institute for Health and Care Research, British Heart Foundation, Department of Health and Social Care, Imperial College London, Public Health England, UK Dementia Research Institute, MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Huo Family Foundation, Medical Research Council, NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, School of Public Health, Imperial College London
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.