From MAST-U to STEP: Power exhaust control challenges and opportunities
This work explores the challenges and opportunities for power exhaust control in STEP, informed by dedicated MAST-U experiments. The STEP system primarily relies on hydrogenic and argon gas injection into the divertors, compensating for transients originating in the plasma core. Fast transients ( > 10 Hz) that evolve too quickly for actuators to compensate must be absorbed passively; the enhanced transient buffering of the foreseen long-legged divertor provides a clear advantage over conventional geometries, as demonstrated in the MAST-U Super-X divertor. Experiments further indicate that STEP’s tight divertor baffling enables near-independent control of the upper and lower divertors. The most challenging transients are expected from power-sharing fluctuations, as MAST-U experiments observed extremely fast dynamics. Fluctuations from core pellet fuelling remain relatively benign due to the small pellet size according to simulations. Exhaust control in a reactor like STEP requires an integrated approach befitting its machine-critical nature. A predictive control element, integrated with core plasma control, allows pre-emptive preparation of the divertor for incoming transients. An observer-based diagnostic approach is foreseen to monitor the divertor in the challenging reactor environment, supported by an extended diagnostic set in the non-nuclear phase to validate the required dynamic models. • Conceptual strategy for STEP power exhaust control informed by MAST-U results. • Alternative divertors enable passive absorption of fast transients. • Tight baffling allows near-independent exhaust control of upper and lower divertors. • Predictive control and core integration are key. • Observer-based diagnostics using an extended diagnostic set in the non-nuclear phase.
Authors
- Michael Lord (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6970-0969)
- B. Kool (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1636-7400)
- N. J. Conway
- Lennard Ceelen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6574-1841)
- M. Lennholm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3444-3999)
- M. van Berkel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6574-3823)
- N. Lonigro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8581-0384)
- J. Lovell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9565-3466)
- A. Parrott
- Adam Cureton
- S.S. Henderson
- O.P. Bardsley
- P.A. Figueiredo
- G.L. Derks
- K. Verhaegh
- T.A. Wijkamp
- S.P. Kobussen
Institutions
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research (NL)
- United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (GB)
- University of York (GB)
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Fusion Engineering and Design
- Published
- 2026-01-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.115602
- Primary Topic
- Magnetic confinement fusion research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00