Pharmacokinetic comparison of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin/telmisartan 10/20/80 mg fixed-dose combination versus coadministration of separate tablets in healthy participants

This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) for fixed-dose combination (FDC) of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin/telmisartan 10/20/80 mg (test) compared to separate tablets of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg FDC and telmisartan 80 mg (reference). A randomized, open-label, 4-period, 2-sequence replicated crossover study was conducted in healthy participants. Each treatment group received a single oral dose of test or reference drug in each period. PK samples during the 1st and 2nd periods were collected for all three drugs, while only telmisartan concentration was measured in the 3rd and 4th periods to evaluate intra-subject variability (ISV) of telmisartan. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of PK parameters and their 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with a linear mixed effect model between each treatment group. To account for the high ISV of telmisartan's peak plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>), the scaled average bioequivalence (SABE) approach was considered in this analysis. A total of 58 participants were randomized, and 49 participants completed the study. PK profiles were comparable between treatments. The GMR and 90% CIs (test-to-reference) of area under the time-concentration curve and C<sub>max</sub> were 0.9835 (0.9260-1.0446) and 0.9873 (0.8830-1.1039) for free ezetimibe, and 0.9937 (0.9459-1.0440) and 1.0617 (0.9844-1.1415) for total ezetimibe. For rosuvastatin, corresponding values were 0.9465 (0.8883-1.0086) and 0.9062 (0.8135-1.0096); for telmisartan, 0.9728 (0.9315-1.0159) and 0.9724 (0.8846-1.0690), respectively. The result established equivalence without utilizing the SABE approach, although the ISV of telmisartan's C<sub>max</sub> was 40.7%. A FDC of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin/telmisartan 10/20/80 mg demonstrated comparable pharmacokinetic profiles to corresponding separate treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-025-04903-4
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacokinetic comparison of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin/telmisartan 10/20/80 mg fixed-dose combination versus coadministration of separate tablets in healthy participants

S. Y. Lee, Seoyoung Goh, Ki Young Huh, Kyung-Sang Yu et al.
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Pharmacokinetic comparison of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin/telmisartan 10/20/80 mg fixed-dose combination versus coadministration of separate tablets in healthy participants

S. Y. Lee, Seoyoung Goh, Ki Young Huh, Kyung-Sang Yu, Joo-Youn Cho
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) for fixed-dose combination (FDC) of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin/telmisartan 10/20/80 mg (test) compared to separate tablets of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg FDC and telmisartan 80 mg (reference). A randomized, open-label, 4-period, 2-sequence replicated crossover study was conducted in healthy participants. Each treatment group received a single oral dose of test or reference drug in each period. PK samples during the 1st and 2nd periods were collected for all three drugs, while only telmisartan concentration was measured in the 3rd and 4th periods to evaluate intra-subject variability (ISV) of telmisartan. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of PK parameters and their 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with a linear mixed effect model between each treatment group. To account for the high ISV of telmisartan's peak plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>), the scaled average bioequivalence (SABE) approach was considered in this analysis. A total of 58 participants were randomized, and 49 participants completed the study. PK profiles were comparable between treatments. The GMR and 90% CIs (test-to-reference) of area under the time-concentration curve and C<sub>max</sub> were 0.9835 (0.9260-1.0446) and 0.9873 (0.8830-1.1039) for free ezetimibe, and 0.9937 (0.9459-1.0440) and 1.0617 (0.9844-1.1415) for total ezetimibe. For rosuvastatin, corresponding values were 0.9465 (0.8883-1.0086) and 0.9062 (0.8135-1.0096); for telmisartan, 0.9728 (0.9315-1.0159) and 0.9724 (0.8846-1.0690), respectively. The result established equivalence without utilizing the SABE approach, although the ISV of telmisartan's C<sub>max</sub> was 40.7%. A FDC of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin/telmisartan 10/20/80 mg demonstrated comparable pharmacokinetic profiles to corresponding separate treatments.

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology
Seoul National University Hospital (KR), National University College (PR)
Yuhan, Seoul National University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.