Characterizing complex upper limb movements with and without visual feedback in typically developing children

The development of upper limb movements has been primarily described through reaching movements, which may not have the complex motor planning and execution demands of many daily tasks. In this study, we introduced a complex task in which individuals had to navigate their hand from a start target through two openings in a simple maze to reach an end target. In half the trials, participants received visual feedback of their hand position, and in half of the trials, they did not. A total of 31 participants aged 8-17 yr completed the study. We found that with visual feedback, reaction time, number of speed peaks, movement time, and hand path length all decreased with age. The number of speed peaks, movement time, and hand path length were all increased without visual feedback. Our results demonstrate that complex upper limb movements are refined across childhood and adolescence, potentially reflecting more anticipatory planning and feedforward control. This task can be applied to clinical populations such as cerebral palsy to assess impairments in motor planning and execution as well as determine how proprioceptive impairments contribute to complex movements.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study used a novel paradigm to examine how children plan and execute complex upper limb movements, both when they have visual feedback of hand position available and when they do not. We show that with age, performance with visual feedback improves, reflecting advancing motor planning and execution abilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00160.2025
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing complex upper limb movements with and without visual feedback in typically developing children

Alexandria N. Richardson, Rachel L. Hawe, Triet Minh Lu
Journal of Neurophysiology
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Characterizing complex upper limb movements with and without visual feedback in typically developing children

Alexandria N. Richardson, Rachel L. Hawe, Triet Minh Lu
article en

Abstract

The development of upper limb movements has been primarily described through reaching movements, which may not have the complex motor planning and execution demands of many daily tasks. In this study, we introduced a complex task in which individuals had to navigate their hand from a start target through two openings in a simple maze to reach an end target. In half the trials, participants received visual feedback of their hand position, and in half of the trials, they did not. A total of 31 participants aged 8-17 yr completed the study. We found that with visual feedback, reaction time, number of speed peaks, movement time, and hand path length all decreased with age. The number of speed peaks, movement time, and hand path length were all increased without visual feedback. Our results demonstrate that complex upper limb movements are refined across childhood and adolescence, potentially reflecting more anticipatory planning and feedforward control. This task can be applied to clinical populations such as cerebral palsy to assess impairments in motor planning and execution as well as determine how proprioceptive impairments contribute to complex movements.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study used a novel paradigm to examine how children plan and execute complex upper limb movements, both when they have visual feedback of hand position available and when they do not. We show that with age, performance with visual feedback improves, reflecting advancing motor planning and execution abilities.

Journal of NeurophysiologyVol. 135(2)
University of Minnesota System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.