Nicotinamide for Skin Cancer Chemoprevention: The Jury Was Out and Still is

Nicotinamide has been widely promoted as a low-cost safe chemopreventive agent against non-melanoma skin cancer. A recent large retrospective study of more than 33,000 US veterans reported a 14% reduction in overall skin cancer risk and a 22% reduction in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with nicotinamide use, with greater benefit observed when initiated early. This critical appraisal identifies key methodological limitations of that study, including unmeasured confounders, immortal time bias, exposure misclassification, flexible analytical modelling and limited external validity. The findings are discussed in the context of two recent systematic reviews (2022 and 2023) to provide a balanced appraisal of the evidence and clarify whether nicotinamide should be recommended in routine practice. Current evidence does not yet confirm the chemopreventive efficacy of nicotinamide. Caution is warranted before its widespread clinical adoption-the jury, as it stands, is still out.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-025-01005-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nicotinamide for Skin Cancer Chemoprevention: The Jury Was Out and Still is

Hywel C Williams, Eugene Tan
1 citations
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
24.20
article

Nicotinamide for Skin Cancer Chemoprevention: The Jury Was Out and Still is

Hywel C Williams, Eugene Tan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Nicotinamide has been widely promoted as a low-cost safe chemopreventive agent against non-melanoma skin cancer. A recent large retrospective study of more than 33,000 US veterans reported a 14% reduction in overall skin cancer risk and a 22% reduction in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with nicotinamide use, with greater benefit observed when initiated early. This critical appraisal identifies key methodological limitations of that study, including unmeasured confounders, immortal time bias, exposure misclassification, flexible analytical modelling and limited external validity. The findings are discussed in the context of two recent systematic reviews (2022 and 2023) to provide a balanced appraisal of the evidence and clarify whether nicotinamide should be recommended in routine practice. Current evidence does not yet confirm the chemopreventive efficacy of nicotinamide. Caution is warranted before its widespread clinical adoption-the jury, as it stands, is still out.

American Journal of Clinical DermatologyVol. 27(2)
University of Nottingham (GB), St Vincent's Clinic (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
24.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nicotinamide for Skin Cancer Chemoprevention: The Jury Was Out and Still is — Hywel C Williams, Eugene Tan · American Journal of Clinical Dermatology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS