Rh and Ni–Fe Alloy Catalysts Supported on <i>γ</i> ‐Al <sub>2</sub> O <sub>3</sub> for CO <sub>2</sub> Methanation: A Combined Kinetic and DRIFTS Study

Catalytic CO 2 methanation offers a promising pathway for converting captured CO 2 and renewable H 2 into synthetic methane. This study presents a comparative investigation of γ ‐Al 2 O 3 ‐supported Ni–Fe alloy and Rh catalysts under identical reaction conditions, integrating parametric evaluation, power‐law kinetic modeling, and in situ DRIFTS. The optimum conditions identified as 623 K, CO 2 :H 2 :Ar = 1:6:3, and GHSV = 60 000 mL h −1 gcat −1 , where 75Ni25Fe showed higher CO 2 conversion, while 100Rh achieved nearly 100% CH 4 selectivity. Both catalysts showed stable performance over 12 h of continuous operation. Kinetic analysis revealed the positive and fractional apparent reaction orders for both CO 2 and H 2 (for 75Ni25Fe, α = 0.28 ± 0.09, and β = 0.34 ± 0.07, whereas for 100Rh, = 0.22 ± 0.06, and β = 0.56 ± 0.05), indicating nonlinear rate dependence on reactant's partial pressures. The apparent activation energy was lower for 100Rh (96 kJ mol −1 ) compared to 75Ni25Fe (114 kJ mol −1 ), reflecting its higher intrinsic activity. In situ DRIFTS revealed distinct mechanistic pathways: Ni–Fe alloy catalyst follows a formate‐mediated route, while the Rh catalyst favors RWGS followed by the CO methanation route. Overall, Rh serves as a benchmark for CH 4 selectivity, while Ni–Fe offers a cost‐effective alternative for CO 2 methanation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.202500543
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rh and Ni–Fe Alloy Catalysts Supported on γ ‐Al 2 O 3 for CO 2 Methanation: A Combined Kinetic and DRIFTS Study

Koustuv Ray, Rajesh Kumar, Jitendra Kumar Prabhakar, Sunil Kumar Sahoo et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
12.85
article

Rh and Ni–Fe Alloy Catalysts Supported on γ ‐Al 2 O 3 for CO 2 Methanation: A Combined Kinetic and DRIFTS Study

Koustuv Ray, Rajesh Kumar, Jitendra Kumar Prabhakar, Sunil Kumar Sahoo, A. Palacios P.
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Catalytic CO 2 methanation offers a promising pathway for converting captured CO 2 and renewable H 2 into synthetic methane. This study presents a comparative investigation of γ ‐Al 2 O 3 ‐supported Ni–Fe alloy and Rh catalysts under identical reaction conditions, integrating parametric evaluation, power‐law kinetic modeling, and in situ DRIFTS. The optimum conditions identified as 623 K, CO 2 :H 2 :Ar = 1:6:3, and GHSV = 60 000 mL h −1 gcat −1 , where 75Ni25Fe showed higher CO 2 conversion, while 100Rh achieved nearly 100% CH 4 selectivity. Both catalysts showed stable performance over 12 h of continuous operation. Kinetic analysis revealed the positive and fractional apparent reaction orders for both CO 2 and H 2 (for 75Ni25Fe, α = 0.28 ± 0.09, and β = 0.34 ± 0.07, whereas for 100Rh, = 0.22 ± 0.06, and β = 0.56 ± 0.05), indicating nonlinear rate dependence on reactant's partial pressures. The apparent activation energy was lower for 100Rh (96 kJ mol −1 ) compared to 75Ni25Fe (114 kJ mol −1 ), reflecting its higher intrinsic activity. In situ DRIFTS revealed distinct mechanistic pathways: Ni–Fe alloy catalyst follows a formate‐mediated route, while the Rh catalyst favors RWGS followed by the CO methanation route. Overall, Rh serves as a benchmark for CH 4 selectivity, while Ni–Fe offers a cost‐effective alternative for CO 2 methanation.

European Journal of Inorganic ChemistryVol. 29(8)
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
12.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rh and Ni–Fe Alloy Catalysts Supported on <i>γ</i> ‐Al <sub>2</sub> O <sub>3</sub> for CO <sub>2</sub> Methanation: A Combined Kinetic and DRIFTS Study — Koustuv Ray, Rajesh Kumar, et al. · European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS