Considering affective state as a central component of the response of animals to environmental changes

Current environmental changes are often considered as negatively impacting the affective state of animals. Yet, the interplay between environmental conditions and affective state should rather be viewed as a reciprocal and dynamic relationship, as variation in affective state likely determines how animals decide to respond to environmental changes. Here, I illustrate how affective states may contribute to determining how animals respond to environmental changes through phenotypic plasticity, environmental modification or dispersal. A condition for future studies to examine this hypothesis will be to consider the response of animals in parallel with valid indicators of affective state reflecting different affective dimensions (valence, arousal) over different timescales. Moreover, considering affective state as a central component of the response of animals to environmental changes implies that a condition to realistically investigate this response is to provide animals with the freedom to decide between options associated with different affective values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology Letters
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2025.0424
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considering affective state as a central component of the response of animals to environmental changes

Michaël Beaulieu
Biology Letters
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

Considering affective state as a central component of the response of animals to environmental changes

Michaël Beaulieu
article en

Abstract

Current environmental changes are often considered as negatively impacting the affective state of animals. Yet, the interplay between environmental conditions and affective state should rather be viewed as a reciprocal and dynamic relationship, as variation in affective state likely determines how animals decide to respond to environmental changes. Here, I illustrate how affective states may contribute to determining how animals respond to environmental changes through phenotypic plasticity, environmental modification or dispersal. A condition for future studies to examine this hypothesis will be to consider the response of animals in parallel with valid indicators of affective state reflecting different affective dimensions (valence, arousal) over different timescales. Moreover, considering affective state as a central component of the response of animals to environmental changes implies that a condition to realistically investigate this response is to provide animals with the freedom to decide between options associated with different affective values.

Biology LettersVol. 22(1)
Wildlife Information Liaison Development (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.