Machining parameters of the patented wood, lightweight stabilised blockboard

Abstract Since the introduction of wood cellular material, or Dendrolight®, the process of creating dimensionally stable wood panels (Berger et al ., 2016) has evolved towards the creation of a similar, but significantly different new material - Lightweight Stabilised Blockboard (LSB). It was patented (Roziņš, M. Vašuks & P. Vašuks, 2014a) with the invented profiled solid wood boards (Roziņš, M. Vašuks & P. Vašuks, 2014b). The LSB design has introduced a smaller groove or kerf height, which hypothetically allows for a reduction in energy consumption during its manufacturing process. Considering that LSB is a new material, most suitable parameters of cutting regime for the LSB mechanical machining have not been developed. To develop machining processes for LSB, it is necessary to determine the optimal cutting tool, machine parameters, expected feed speed and cutting power. The study analyses the parameters of cutting regime that affect the cutting power, and performs theoretical calculations that reveal the expected and most suitable cutting process indicators in the industrial production of LSB, as well as compares the machining of LSB and Dendrolight®. A new evaluation parameter has been introduced that characterises the ratio between the cutting power and the permissible feed speed. It was concluded that grooving LSB lamellae requires significantly less cutting power, and that higher feed speeds are possible compared with the grooving of analogous Dendrolight® lamellae. However, the cutting power required for the LSB grooving is still quite energy-intensive, which potentially limits the possible width of LSB lamellae and the number of simultaneously operating cutting tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rural Sustainability Research
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/plua-2025-0020
Primary Topic
Wood Treatment and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machining parameters of the patented wood, lightweight stabilised blockboard

Uldis Spulle, Rihards Roziņš, V. Jakovlevs, Andis Ābele
Rural Sustainability Research
Wood Treatment and Properties
article

Machining parameters of the patented wood, lightweight stabilised blockboard

Uldis Spulle, Rihards Roziņš, V. Jakovlevs, Andis Ābele
article en

Abstract

Abstract Since the introduction of wood cellular material, or Dendrolight®, the process of creating dimensionally stable wood panels (Berger et al ., 2016) has evolved towards the creation of a similar, but significantly different new material - Lightweight Stabilised Blockboard (LSB). It was patented (Roziņš, M. Vašuks & P. Vašuks, 2014a) with the invented profiled solid wood boards (Roziņš, M. Vašuks & P. Vašuks, 2014b). The LSB design has introduced a smaller groove or kerf height, which hypothetically allows for a reduction in energy consumption during its manufacturing process. Considering that LSB is a new material, most suitable parameters of cutting regime for the LSB mechanical machining have not been developed. To develop machining processes for LSB, it is necessary to determine the optimal cutting tool, machine parameters, expected feed speed and cutting power. The study analyses the parameters of cutting regime that affect the cutting power, and performs theoretical calculations that reveal the expected and most suitable cutting process indicators in the industrial production of LSB, as well as compares the machining of LSB and Dendrolight®. A new evaluation parameter has been introduced that characterises the ratio between the cutting power and the permissible feed speed. It was concluded that grooving LSB lamellae requires significantly less cutting power, and that higher feed speeds are possible compared with the grooving of analogous Dendrolight® lamellae. However, the cutting power required for the LSB grooving is still quite energy-intensive, which potentially limits the possible width of LSB lamellae and the number of simultaneously operating cutting tools.

Rural Sustainability ResearchVol. 54(349)
Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies (LV), Malnavas koledža (LV)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Wood Treatment and Properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.