Performance assessment of commonly used active radiation protection dosimeters for individual and area workplace monitoring

Improvement in radiation protection practice may be achieved by acquisition of reliable and accurate dosimetry data. Use of dosimeters with known properties provides insight into their performance in real radiation fields encountered in radiation monitoring practice. Performance evaluation in a wide range of radiation conditions provides insight into dosimeter behaviour, providing input for revision, update and harmonization of IEC type testing standards. A total of 32 active dosimeters were investigated, of which 26 are used for area workplace, and 6 for individual monitoring. Dosimeter performance was evaluated against the IEC 60846–1:2009 standard for portable workplace and environmental meters and monitors and the IEC 61526:2024 standard for active personal dosimeters in a wide range of photon energies, angles of incidence and dose equivalent rates. Performance was examined beyond the minimum rated range: 33.3 keV–1.25 MeV photon energy; (0°; ±75°) angle of incidence for personal dosimeters and (0°; ±120° with 180°) for area dosimeters; 3 μSv h −1 – 7 Sv h −1 dose rate range. In addition, dosimeter short-term stability and overload properties were investigated. State-of-the-art and commonly used dosimeters complied with the standard defined limits of variation with respect to the manufacturer stated specifications. Some dosimeters had significantly lower variations in terms of relative response than the current standard stated requirements. Potential update of the relevant IEC type testing standards was considered, with the possibility of introducing two distinct dosimeter classes, one of which would comply with reduced limits of variation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2026.102159
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance assessment of commonly used active radiation protection dosimeters for individual and area workplace monitoring

Miloš Živanović, Luka Bakrač, Vladimír Sochor, N. Todorović et al.
1 citations
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Radiation Dose and Imaging
31.92
article

Performance assessment of commonly used active radiation protection dosimeters for individual and area workplace monitoring

Miloš Živanović, Luka Bakrač, Vladimír Sochor, N. Todorović, I. Stojanovic, Nikola Kržanović, Siarhei Saroka, Maria do Céu Ferreira, Jelena Lj Vlahović, T. Siiskonen, Liviu-Cristian Mihailescu, Erinc Reyhanoglu, Argiro Boziari, Ana Fernandes, Jana Šmoldasová, Miloš Đaletić
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Improvement in radiation protection practice may be achieved by acquisition of reliable and accurate dosimetry data. Use of dosimeters with known properties provides insight into their performance in real radiation fields encountered in radiation monitoring practice. Performance evaluation in a wide range of radiation conditions provides insight into dosimeter behaviour, providing input for revision, update and harmonization of IEC type testing standards. A total of 32 active dosimeters were investigated, of which 26 are used for area workplace, and 6 for individual monitoring. Dosimeter performance was evaluated against the IEC 60846–1:2009 standard for portable workplace and environmental meters and monitors and the IEC 61526:2024 standard for active personal dosimeters in a wide range of photon energies, angles of incidence and dose equivalent rates. Performance was examined beyond the minimum rated range: 33.3 keV–1.25 MeV photon energy; (0°; ±75°) angle of incidence for personal dosimeters and (0°; ±120° with 180°) for area dosimeters; 3 μSv h −1 – 7 Sv h −1 dose rate range. In addition, dosimeter short-term stability and overload properties were investigated. State-of-the-art and commonly used dosimeters complied with the standard defined limits of variation with respect to the manufacturer stated specifications. Some dosimeters had significantly lower variations in terms of relative response than the current standard stated requirements. Potential update of the relevant IEC type testing standards was considered, with the possibility of introducing two distinct dosimeter classes, one of which would comply with reduced limits of variation.

Journal of Radiation Research and Applied SciencesVol. 19(1)
University of Novi Sad (RS), University of Belgrade (RS), Small and Medium Enterprises Development Organization (TR), Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (BE), Instituto Português Da Qualidade (PT), Ruđer Bošković Institute (HR), Český metrologický institut (CZ), Institute of Applied Physics (MD), Ellinogermaniki Agogi (GR), Instituto Superior Técnico (PT), Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
31.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.