Nature exposure reduces self-reported pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pain is a global health issue with substantial individual, societal and economic impacts. Given the risks of pharmacological treatments, complementary approaches to pain management are essential. Nature exposure has emerged as a promising nonpharmacological strategy, but evidence of its effectiveness is inconclusive. Here in this systematic review and meta-analysis we examined 62 studies (96 effects) across 21 countries, including 4,439 participants, to assess the impact of nature exposure on self-reported pain. The results indicate a significant small-to-moderate reduction in pain associated with nature exposure (standardized mean difference of 0.53), but studies exhibited moderate-to-high risk of bias and substantial heterogeneity. Studies evaluating nature against matched comparators reported effects roughly half the size of those using nonmatched controls and multisensory stimuli tended to show stronger effects. These findings support nature as a promising complementary pain management strategy. However, high heterogeneity and risk of bias warrant caution and highlight the need for more rigorous research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Mental Health
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-025-00569-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nature exposure reduces self-reported pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

M. Lawrence White, Maximilian O. Steininger, Claus Lamm, Jonas Paul Nitschke
1 citations
Nature Mental Health
Urban Green Space and Health
31.09
article

Nature exposure reduces self-reported pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

M. Lawrence White, Maximilian O. Steininger, Claus Lamm, Jonas Paul Nitschke
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Pain is a global health issue with substantial individual, societal and economic impacts. Given the risks of pharmacological treatments, complementary approaches to pain management are essential. Nature exposure has emerged as a promising nonpharmacological strategy, but evidence of its effectiveness is inconclusive. Here in this systematic review and meta-analysis we examined 62 studies (96 effects) across 21 countries, including 4,439 participants, to assess the impact of nature exposure on self-reported pain. The results indicate a significant small-to-moderate reduction in pain associated with nature exposure (standardized mean difference of 0.53), but studies exhibited moderate-to-high risk of bias and substantial heterogeneity. Studies evaluating nature against matched comparators reported effects roughly half the size of those using nonmatched controls and multisensory stimuli tended to show stronger effects. These findings support nature as a promising complementary pain management strategy. However, high heterogeneity and risk of bias warrant caution and highlight the need for more rigorous research.

Nature Mental HealthVol. 4(1)
University of Vienna (AT), University of Exeter (GB), Complexity Science Hub (AT)
Austrian Science Fund, Universität Wien, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Urban Green Space and Health
31.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.