URBAN-RURAL DIFFERENCES IN PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH EMERGENCY OPHTHALMOLOGICAL CARE IN THE ABAY REGION, KAZAKHSTAN: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Introduction. Worldwide, cataracts, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and dry eyes remain the main causes of vision loss, and up to 80% of cases can be prevented with timely medical care. However, access problems and the growing number of emergency department visits for non-urgent eye diseases continue to put strain on health systems. In Kazakhstan, the hospital accreditation system has been developing since the early 2010s, but differences in infrastructure and access - especially between urban and rural areas - remain a problem for the provision of emergency ophthalmic care. The purpose of this study was to assess the provision and quality of emergency ophthalmological care in the Abai region of Kazakhstan, comparing urban and rural populations from the perspectives of patients. Materials and methods. A structured 37-item questionnaire was developed and pilot-tested to assess emergency ophthalmologic care in the Abay region. A prospective descriptive study was conducted from January to June 2025 using continuous sampling. Data were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square test and univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with patient satisfaction. Analyzes were conducted in Stata 15.1 (p < 0.05). Results. The survey included 221 respondents—123 urban (55.7%) and 98 rural (44.3%). Urban participants were younger, better educated, and more frequently employed, while rural respondents were older, more often female, and had lower income and education levels. Although urban patients reported slightly higher satisfaction with staff professionalism, hygiene, and attentiveness, most differences were not statistically significant. Rural patients were more likely to report clear explanations from doctors (63.4% vs. 53.1%, p = 0.034). Overall satisfaction was significantly linked to timely access to medication, higher monthly healthcare spending, and patients’ understanding of the reasons behind their treatment. Conclusion Urban and rural patients in the Abay region show significant differences in demographics and satisfaction with emergency eye care, with urban patients generally reporting higher satisfaction due to better access and communication. To improve equity, policymakers should focus on enhancing rural service accessibility, timely medication delivery, and strengthening patient-provider communication to boost overall satisfaction and outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2025.6.4.10
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

URBAN-RURAL DIFFERENCES IN PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH EMERGENCY OPHTHALMOLOGICAL CARE IN THE ABAY REGION, KAZAKHSTAN: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Gulnara Kapanova, A. Imamatdinova, Kenesh Dzhusupov, Dastan Turganbayev et al.
Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
article

URBAN-RURAL DIFFERENCES IN PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH EMERGENCY OPHTHALMOLOGICAL CARE IN THE ABAY REGION, KAZAKHSTAN: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Gulnara Kapanova, A. Imamatdinova, Kenesh Dzhusupov, Dastan Turganbayev, Assem Konysbayeva, Tolkyn Boranbay
article en

Abstract

Introduction. Worldwide, cataracts, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and dry eyes remain the main causes of vision loss, and up to 80% of cases can be prevented with timely medical care. However, access problems and the growing number of emergency department visits for non-urgent eye diseases continue to put strain on health systems. In Kazakhstan, the hospital accreditation system has been developing since the early 2010s, but differences in infrastructure and access - especially between urban and rural areas - remain a problem for the provision of emergency ophthalmic care. The purpose of this study was to assess the provision and quality of emergency ophthalmological care in the Abai region of Kazakhstan, comparing urban and rural populations from the perspectives of patients. Materials and methods. A structured 37-item questionnaire was developed and pilot-tested to assess emergency ophthalmologic care in the Abay region. A prospective descriptive study was conducted from January to June 2025 using continuous sampling. Data were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square test and univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with patient satisfaction. Analyzes were conducted in Stata 15.1 (p < 0.05). Results. The survey included 221 respondents—123 urban (55.7%) and 98 rural (44.3%). Urban participants were younger, better educated, and more frequently employed, while rural respondents were older, more often female, and had lower income and education levels. Although urban patients reported slightly higher satisfaction with staff professionalism, hygiene, and attentiveness, most differences were not statistically significant. Rural patients were more likely to report clear explanations from doctors (63.4% vs. 53.1%, p = 0.034). Overall satisfaction was significantly linked to timely access to medication, higher monthly healthcare spending, and patients’ understanding of the reasons behind their treatment. Conclusion Urban and rural patients in the Abay region show significant differences in demographics and satisfaction with emergency eye care, with urban patients generally reporting higher satisfaction due to better access and communication. To improve equity, policymakers should focus on enhancing rural service accessibility, timely medication delivery, and strengthening patient-provider communication to boost overall satisfaction and outcomes.

Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and EthicsVol. 6(4)
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (KZ), Kazakh National Medical University (KZ), International Higher School of Medicine
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.