Glial fibrillary acidic protein is elevated in preclinical AD

Abstract Background Non‐specific Alzheimer's Disease (AD) biomarkers like glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (Nfl) are now included in the diagnosis and staging of AD, but more work is needed to fully understand their utility in early detection of AD. The present study examined plasma GFAP, Nfl, amyloid beta (Aβ) 40, and Aβ42 in individuals with AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and subjective cognitive decline (SCD) who were either amyloid positive (A+) or negative (A‐) according to florbetapir positron emission tomography scan neuroradiological read. The goal was to determine whether individuals with preclinical AD (SCD/A+) show biomarker profiles similar to those expected in AD and MCI (i.e., higher GFAP and Nfl and lower Aβ40 and Aβ42) compared to SCD individuals at lower risk (SCD/A‐). Method Individuals with AD (24 A+, 5 A‐), MCI (21 A+, 17 A‐) and SCD (5 A+, 11 A‐), as determined by clinician referral, completed a blood draw and neuropsychological testing. Blood samples were collected, processed, and stored per previously published guidelines. Plasma samples were assayed using the Neurology 4‐Plex E+ assay on the HD‐X analyzer (Quanterix, MA). Coefficients of variation for all assays were ≤5%. Generalized linear models (GLMs) with false discovery rate correction examined the effects of diagnosis severity (AD, MCI, SCD) and amyloid status (A+, A‐) on plasma levels for each biomarker and the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, with covariates of age and sex. Associations between biomarkers and global cognitive functioning, as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), were also examined. Result The Severity x Amyloid status interaction indicated that GFAP was higher (χ 2 (2)=6.9, p = .032) and Aβ42/Aβ40 was lower (χ 2 (2)=13.1, p = .001) in AD/A+ versus AD/A‐ and in SCD/A+ versus SCD/A‐, but amyloid status did not moderate GFAP or Aβ42/Aβ40 in MCI. GLMs for Nfl, Aβ 40, and Aβ 42 did not yield significant effects. GFAP was negatively correlated with MoCA for MCI (ρ=‐.61, p <.001) and SCD (rρ=‐.59, p = .016) groups but not for AD (ρ =‐.15, p = .45). Conclusion Individuals with preclinical AD (SCD/A+) showed biomarker profiles consistent with AD (higher GFAP; lower Aβ42/Aβ40) and GFAP was associated with poorer global cognition in MCI and SCD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_105873
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Glial fibrillary acidic protein is elevated in preclinical AD

Andrew B. Lawson, Jens H. Jensen, Federico Rodríguez‐Porcel, Andreana M. Benitez et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Glial fibrillary acidic protein is elevated in preclinical AD

Andrew B. Lawson, Jens H. Jensen, Federico Rodríguez‐Porcel, Andreana M. Benitez, Steven L. Carroll, Dariusz Pytel, Eric D. Hamlett, Katie L Barlis, Travis E Turner, Jacobo Mintzer, Olga Brawman‐Mintzer, Jane E Joseph
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Non‐specific Alzheimer's Disease (AD) biomarkers like glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (Nfl) are now included in the diagnosis and staging of AD, but more work is needed to fully understand their utility in early detection of AD. The present study examined plasma GFAP, Nfl, amyloid beta (Aβ) 40, and Aβ42 in individuals with AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and subjective cognitive decline (SCD) who were either amyloid positive (A+) or negative (A‐) according to florbetapir positron emission tomography scan neuroradiological read. The goal was to determine whether individuals with preclinical AD (SCD/A+) show biomarker profiles similar to those expected in AD and MCI (i.e., higher GFAP and Nfl and lower Aβ40 and Aβ42) compared to SCD individuals at lower risk (SCD/A‐). Method Individuals with AD (24 A+, 5 A‐), MCI (21 A+, 17 A‐) and SCD (5 A+, 11 A‐), as determined by clinician referral, completed a blood draw and neuropsychological testing. Blood samples were collected, processed, and stored per previously published guidelines. Plasma samples were assayed using the Neurology 4‐Plex E+ assay on the HD‐X analyzer (Quanterix, MA). Coefficients of variation for all assays were ≤5%. Generalized linear models (GLMs) with false discovery rate correction examined the effects of diagnosis severity (AD, MCI, SCD) and amyloid status (A+, A‐) on plasma levels for each biomarker and the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, with covariates of age and sex. Associations between biomarkers and global cognitive functioning, as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), were also examined. Result The Severity x Amyloid status interaction indicated that GFAP was higher (χ 2 (2)=6.9, p = .032) and Aβ42/Aβ40 was lower (χ 2 (2)=13.1, p = .001) in AD/A+ versus AD/A‐ and in SCD/A+ versus SCD/A‐, but amyloid status did not moderate GFAP or Aβ42/Aβ40 in MCI. GLMs for Nfl, Aβ 40, and Aβ 42 did not yield significant effects. GFAP was negatively correlated with MoCA for MCI (ρ=‐.61, p <.001) and SCD (rρ=‐.59, p = .016) groups but not for AD (ρ =‐.15, p = .45). Conclusion Individuals with preclinical AD (SCD/A+) showed biomarker profiles consistent with AD (higher GFAP; lower Aβ42/Aβ40) and GFAP was associated with poorer global cognition in MCI and SCD.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
University of Arizona (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.