From AI security to ethical AI security: a comparative risk-mitigation framework for classical and hybrid AI governance

Abstract As Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems evolve from classical to hybrid classical-quantum architectures, traditional notions of security—mainly centered on technical robustness—are no longer sufficient. This study aims to provide an integrated security ethics compliance framework that bridges technical and ethical dimensions across the AI lifecycle. By adopting a security ethics-by-design approach, the framework introduces mitigation measures in relation to key ethical principles capable of addressing emerging risks and considering AI governance needs in the initial AI design and development phases. This study proposes a novel framework, currently absent from the literature, to address security ethics challenges in both classical and hybrid systems. Key contributions include the integration of post-quantum and quantum cryptography, particularly homomorphic encryption, to ensure long-term privacy and security in hybrid AI. The framework also includes bias testing and explainable AI techniques to promote fairness and explainability, and to prevent safety-related vulnerabilities—such as algorithmic bias—from serving as vectors for malicious, discriminatory attacks. Ultimately, it provides a preliminary roadmap for embedding ethical security considerations throughout the lifecycle of classical and hybrid AI systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00935-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From AI security to ethical AI security: a comparative risk-mitigation framework for classical and hybrid AI governance

Ludovica Ilari, Simona Tiribelli, Filippo Caruso
1 citations
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
25.65
article

From AI security to ethical AI security: a comparative risk-mitigation framework for classical and hybrid AI governance

Ludovica Ilari, Simona Tiribelli, Filippo Caruso
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract As Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems evolve from classical to hybrid classical-quantum architectures, traditional notions of security—mainly centered on technical robustness—are no longer sufficient. This study aims to provide an integrated security ethics compliance framework that bridges technical and ethical dimensions across the AI lifecycle. By adopting a security ethics-by-design approach, the framework introduces mitigation measures in relation to key ethical principles capable of addressing emerging risks and considering AI governance needs in the initial AI design and development phases. This study proposes a novel framework, currently absent from the literature, to address security ethics challenges in both classical and hybrid systems. Key contributions include the integration of post-quantum and quantum cryptography, particularly homomorphic encryption, to ensure long-term privacy and security in hybrid AI. The framework also includes bias testing and explainable AI techniques to promote fairness and explainability, and to prevent safety-related vulnerabilities—such as algorithmic bias—from serving as vectors for malicious, discriminatory attacks. Ultimately, it provides a preliminary roadmap for embedding ethical security considerations throughout the lifecycle of classical and hybrid AI systems.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(1)
University of Florence (IT), University of Macerata (IT)
European Commission, Università degli Studi di Firenze
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
25.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.