Food Access and Chronic Disease Risk Among Original Residents of Gentrifying Neighborhoods in the United States

Introduction. Gentrification may affect cardiometabolic health, but most studies are limited by lack of longitudinal data. To accurately assess impacts on original residents of gentrifying neighborhoods, it is necessary to follow individuals who remain in their neighborhoods (stayers) and those who leave (movers). Methods. Gentrification measures derived from the US census and retail measures derived from the National Establishment Time Series were linked to the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. Study 1 assessed longitudinal associations between gentrification and the proportion of food retailers generally providing healthy food. Study 2 assessed cross-sectional associations between gentrification and cardiometabolic risk factors (metabolic syndrome and its components, food and housing insecurity, stress, racial discrimination). Both studies focused on residents of census tracts eligible for gentrification who grew up in below-median income households, examined two time periods (Wave 3 to 4 [N=3,397], Wave 4 to 5 [N=2,836]), and assessed moderation by self-reported race/ethnicity. Results. In Study 1, among stayers, gentrification from Wave 3 to 4 was associated with a lower share of healthy food retailers in the overall sample and among White participants; there were no associations for movers. Gentrification from Wave 4 to 5 was associated with a higher share of healthy retailers for Black stayers, but not other stayers, and a lower share of healthy retailers for Hispanic/Latino movers, but not other movers. In Study 2, among stayers, gentrification from Wave 3 to 4 was associated with lower food insecurity and fast food consumption in the overall sample. These beneficial associations were driven by White participants; meanwhile, there were harmful associations between gentrification and risk factors for Black stayers (racial discrimination) and movers (central obesity) and Hispanic/Latino stayers (low HDL-cholesterol) and movers (hypertension). Gentrification from Wave 4 to 5 was associated with higher odds of central obesity in the overall sample for stayers, but there were beneficial associations between gentrification and risk factors for Black movers (central obesity) and Hispanic/Latino movers (hypertension). Conclusions. Gentrification is not consistently harmful or beneficial for cardiometabolic health of original residents. Policymakers should not assume gentrification improves food environments or chronic disease risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/bke6-8t21
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Food Access and Chronic Disease Risk Among Original Residents of Gentrifying Neighborhoods in the United States

Sarah M. Halvorson-Fried
UNC Libraries
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Food Access and Chronic Disease Risk Among Original Residents of Gentrifying Neighborhoods in the United States

Sarah M. Halvorson-Fried
article en

Abstract

Introduction. Gentrification may affect cardiometabolic health, but most studies are limited by lack of longitudinal data. To accurately assess impacts on original residents of gentrifying neighborhoods, it is necessary to follow individuals who remain in their neighborhoods (stayers) and those who leave (movers). Methods. Gentrification measures derived from the US census and retail measures derived from the National Establishment Time Series were linked to the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. Study 1 assessed longitudinal associations between gentrification and the proportion of food retailers generally providing healthy food. Study 2 assessed cross-sectional associations between gentrification and cardiometabolic risk factors (metabolic syndrome and its components, food and housing insecurity, stress, racial discrimination). Both studies focused on residents of census tracts eligible for gentrification who grew up in below-median income households, examined two time periods (Wave 3 to 4 [N=3,397], Wave 4 to 5 [N=2,836]), and assessed moderation by self-reported race/ethnicity. Results. In Study 1, among stayers, gentrification from Wave 3 to 4 was associated with a lower share of healthy food retailers in the overall sample and among White participants; there were no associations for movers. Gentrification from Wave 4 to 5 was associated with a higher share of healthy retailers for Black stayers, but not other stayers, and a lower share of healthy retailers for Hispanic/Latino movers, but not other movers. In Study 2, among stayers, gentrification from Wave 3 to 4 was associated with lower food insecurity and fast food consumption in the overall sample. These beneficial associations were driven by White participants; meanwhile, there were harmful associations between gentrification and risk factors for Black stayers (racial discrimination) and movers (central obesity) and Hispanic/Latino stayers (low HDL-cholesterol) and movers (hypertension). Gentrification from Wave 4 to 5 was associated with higher odds of central obesity in the overall sample for stayers, but there were beneficial associations between gentrification and risk factors for Black movers (central obesity) and Hispanic/Latino movers (hypertension). Conclusions. Gentrification is not consistently harmful or beneficial for cardiometabolic health of original residents. Policymakers should not assume gentrification improves food environments or chronic disease risk.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
National Institutes of Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.