Optimizing district heating networks: Balancing cost, efficiency and consumer benefits

• A new method quantifies how DHN design choices affect end-user energy use. • In 100 random small DHNs, cost-optimization reduces cost with a mean of 6.5% with a max. of 19%. • For small DHNs, efficiency improvements are rarely associated with marginal cost increases. • Among 100 randomly generated small DHNs, only 6% show a 1% efficiency increase with a cost increase below 10%. • An efficiency increase from 56.5% to 67.9% in the Delft heat network case leads to 18% higher costs. District heating networks (DHNs) are essential for decarbonizing building energy demand and are expected to play a larger role in future energy systems. Optimizing DHN design is vital as it directly impacts system cost and performance. Current optimization methods focus on minimizing cost without considering technical performance or its impact on its end-users. In some regions, there is limited social acceptance for DHN due to poor technical performance, highlighting the need to integrate consumer-oriented performance criteria in the design phase. This study proposes a DHN optimization method that explicitly incorporates user-level performance when evaluating different DHN designs. Two design strategies—a cost-optimal design and a maximum-efficiency design—are compared across 100 small, randomly generated DHNs and on a large real-world case. For small DHNs, the cost associated with efficiency improvements shows high variability. Only 6% of cases exhibit a cost increase below 10% per 1% efficiency gain, and only 3% are within the range of 0.5–2%. In the large DHN case, efficiency optimization increases the network’s efficiency from 56.5% to 69.7% at 18% cost increase. Efficiency-oriented designs significantly reduce consumer exposure to thermal discomfort under cold outdoor conditions or heat-source disturbances, and require less energy to meet demand. As network efficiency can potentially yield great benefits for consumers in the DHN, focusing solely on cost optimization is shortsighted. More emphasis on network efficiency may increase social acceptance of DHN and by that accelerate the energy transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Buildings
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116936
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
65.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing district heating networks: Balancing cost, efficiency and consumer benefits

Petra Heijnen, Martijn Warnier, Martijn Piket
3 citations
Energy and Buildings
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
65.79
article

Optimizing district heating networks: Balancing cost, efficiency and consumer benefits

Petra Heijnen, Martijn Warnier, Martijn Piket
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• A new method quantifies how DHN design choices affect end-user energy use. • In 100 random small DHNs, cost-optimization reduces cost with a mean of 6.5% with a max. of 19%. • For small DHNs, efficiency improvements are rarely associated with marginal cost increases. • Among 100 randomly generated small DHNs, only 6% show a 1% efficiency increase with a cost increase below 10%. • An efficiency increase from 56.5% to 67.9% in the Delft heat network case leads to 18% higher costs. District heating networks (DHNs) are essential for decarbonizing building energy demand and are expected to play a larger role in future energy systems. Optimizing DHN design is vital as it directly impacts system cost and performance. Current optimization methods focus on minimizing cost without considering technical performance or its impact on its end-users. In some regions, there is limited social acceptance for DHN due to poor technical performance, highlighting the need to integrate consumer-oriented performance criteria in the design phase. This study proposes a DHN optimization method that explicitly incorporates user-level performance when evaluating different DHN designs. Two design strategies—a cost-optimal design and a maximum-efficiency design—are compared across 100 small, randomly generated DHNs and on a large real-world case. For small DHNs, the cost associated with efficiency improvements shows high variability. Only 6% of cases exhibit a cost increase below 10% per 1% efficiency gain, and only 3% are within the range of 0.5–2%. In the large DHN case, efficiency optimization increases the network’s efficiency from 56.5% to 69.7% at 18% cost increase. Efficiency-oriented designs significantly reduce consumer exposure to thermal discomfort under cold outdoor conditions or heat-source disturbances, and require less energy to meet demand. As network efficiency can potentially yield great benefits for consumers in the DHN, focusing solely on cost optimization is shortsighted. More emphasis on network efficiency may increase social acceptance of DHN and by that accelerate the energy transition.

Energy and BuildingsVol. 354
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
65.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.