A <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" id="d1e908" altimg="si143.svg"> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> </mml:math> -ary Choquet-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for assessing sustainability indicators in urban dev

This research acknowledges the existence of a dichotomy between the weak sustainability (WS) and strong sustainability (SST) paradigms, which can heavily influence decision-making analysis methods. Rather than entering the debate between WS and SST, we take the need for SST as a starting point and concern ourselves with its applicability. To do so, we introduce an original three-tier SST performance range corresponding to as many ways of aggregating and presenting indicators. We adopt the p-ary Choquet integral to encompass these three declinations, and a parsimonious elicitation method introduced by Labreuche and Grabisch to ensure that the problem remains manageable. The advantages of this method in supporting the awareness of Decision Makers regarding their choices are illustrated through the application to a case study concerning the transformation of a historic building located in the city of Turin, Italy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Decision Analytics Journal
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2026.100673
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" id="d1e908" altimg="si143.svg"> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> </mml:math> -ary Choquet-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for assessing sustainability indicators in urban dev

Isabella Maria Lami, Matteo Brunelli, Beatrice Mecca
Decision Analytics Journal
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

A <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" id="d1e908" altimg="si143.svg"> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> </mml:math> -ary Choquet-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for assessing sustainability indicators in urban dev

Isabella Maria Lami, Matteo Brunelli, Beatrice Mecca
article en

Abstract

This research acknowledges the existence of a dichotomy between the weak sustainability (WS) and strong sustainability (SST) paradigms, which can heavily influence decision-making analysis methods. Rather than entering the debate between WS and SST, we take the need for SST as a starting point and concern ourselves with its applicability. To do so, we introduce an original three-tier SST performance range corresponding to as many ways of aggregating and presenting indicators. We adopt the p-ary Choquet integral to encompass these three declinations, and a parsimonious elicitation method introduced by Labreuche and Grabisch to ensure that the problem remains manageable. The advantages of this method in supporting the awareness of Decision Makers regarding their choices are illustrated through the application to a case study concerning the transformation of a historic building located in the city of Turin, Italy.

Decision Analytics JournalVol. 18
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" id="d1e908" altimg="si143.svg"> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> </mml:math> -ary Choquet-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for assessing sustainability indicators in urban dev — Isabella Maria Lami, Matteo Brunelli, et al. · Decision Analytics Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS