Length of look-back periods in studies using administrative data: a scoping review

Administrative data, including electronic health record (EHR) and claims data, are increasingly used to generate real-world evidence for epidemiologic research. Unlike clinical trials, which assess baseline conditions at the initial visit, observational studies using these data must define an appropriate lookback period to identify baseline characteristics. However, no established guidelines exist on the optimal length of lookback periods by clinical outcome. We conducted a scoping review, with a lens on methodological studies, to assess the frequency and variability of lookback periods used in epidemiologic studies. We searched PubMed for studies that employed lookback periods using EHR, claims data, or international registries. Our search yielded 262 studies spanning a broad range of clinical outcomes. We found that lookback periods varied significantly, ranging from 12 hours to 39 years, depending on the clinical outcome. The most common clinical areas included pharmacology, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and healthcare utilization. Our review underscores the need for tailored lookback periods based on the clinical context and suggests that a one-size-fits-all approach may be inadequate. Future research should focus on the impact of lookback periods on less-studied outcomes. This review provides a resource for researchers to make informed decisions on the appropriate lookback periods in epidemiologic studies utilizing administrative data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemiologic Reviews
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxaf019
Primary Topic
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Length of look-back periods in studies using administrative data: a scoping review

Sirajbir S. Sodhi, Nrupen A. Bhavsar, Miriam Chisholm, Tonia Poteat et al.
Epidemiologic Reviews
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
article

Length of look-back periods in studies using administrative data: a scoping review

Sirajbir S. Sodhi, Nrupen A. Bhavsar, Miriam Chisholm, Tonia Poteat, Matthew Boykin, Whitney R. Robinson, Moronke Ogundolie, S. A. Chopra, Sricharan Navuluri, Alexandra Gaviser, Samantha Kaplan
article en

Abstract

Administrative data, including electronic health record (EHR) and claims data, are increasingly used to generate real-world evidence for epidemiologic research. Unlike clinical trials, which assess baseline conditions at the initial visit, observational studies using these data must define an appropriate lookback period to identify baseline characteristics. However, no established guidelines exist on the optimal length of lookback periods by clinical outcome. We conducted a scoping review, with a lens on methodological studies, to assess the frequency and variability of lookback periods used in epidemiologic studies. We searched PubMed for studies that employed lookback periods using EHR, claims data, or international registries. Our search yielded 262 studies spanning a broad range of clinical outcomes. We found that lookback periods varied significantly, ranging from 12 hours to 39 years, depending on the clinical outcome. The most common clinical areas included pharmacology, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and healthcare utilization. Our review underscores the need for tailored lookback periods based on the clinical context and suggests that a one-size-fits-all approach may be inadequate. Future research should focus on the impact of lookback periods on less-studied outcomes. This review provides a resource for researchers to make informed decisions on the appropriate lookback periods in epidemiologic studies utilizing administrative data.

Epidemiologic Reviews
Duke University (US), Duke Energy (United States) (US), Duke Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.