Analysis of 2022 and 2023 Osun State basic education certificate examination mathematics items using item response theory: Implications for large scale assessment

This study examined the item parameters of 2022 and 2023 Osun State Basic Education Certificate Examination (BECE) Mathematics items using Item Response Theory (IRT), with a focus on discrimination, difficulty, and differences in the item parameters. While most Nigerian studies focus on national assessments, limited attention has been given to state-level examinations, leaving the quality and fairness of items underexplored. An ex-post facto design was adopted, with a population of 34,899 (2022) and 35,857 (2023) candidates. A systematic random sample of 1052 responses was analysed using a 3-parameter logistic model. The instrument consisted of adopted 2022 and 2023 BECE Mathematics items, comprising 60 multiple-choice questions. We analyse data using the Jmetrik software. Results showed that 32 items in 2022 and 37 items in 2023 met acceptable psychometric standards, while nine and one items, respectively, exhibited poor difficulty indices. Difficulty analysis indicated that nine items in 2022 and one item in 2023 demonstrated poor indices. No significant difference was observed in the psychometric properties of the two examination years (t = 0.75, df = 1050, p > .05). These results highlight inconsistencies in item quality across years, raising concerns about fairness and reliability in high-stakes assessments. The study contributes to discourse on large-scale assessments by situating Nigerian state-level examinations within global debates on fairness, accountability, and psychometric rigour. It further underscores the value of IRT in aligning Nigeria's assessment practices with international best practices. These findings underscore the importance of enhancing the psychometric quality of mathematics items and aligning evaluation practices with international standards of educational equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102381
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
58.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of 2022 and 2023 Osun State basic education certificate examination mathematics items using item response theory: Implications for large scale assessment

Opesemowo Oluwaseyi Aina Gbolade, Kehinde Olufunke Opatunji, Titilope Rachael Opesemowo, Temitope Babatimehin
1 citations
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
58.08
article

Analysis of 2022 and 2023 Osun State basic education certificate examination mathematics items using item response theory: Implications for large scale assessment

Opesemowo Oluwaseyi Aina Gbolade, Kehinde Olufunke Opatunji, Titilope Rachael Opesemowo, Temitope Babatimehin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examined the item parameters of 2022 and 2023 Osun State Basic Education Certificate Examination (BECE) Mathematics items using Item Response Theory (IRT), with a focus on discrimination, difficulty, and differences in the item parameters. While most Nigerian studies focus on national assessments, limited attention has been given to state-level examinations, leaving the quality and fairness of items underexplored. An ex-post facto design was adopted, with a population of 34,899 (2022) and 35,857 (2023) candidates. A systematic random sample of 1052 responses was analysed using a 3-parameter logistic model. The instrument consisted of adopted 2022 and 2023 BECE Mathematics items, comprising 60 multiple-choice questions. We analyse data using the Jmetrik software. Results showed that 32 items in 2022 and 37 items in 2023 met acceptable psychometric standards, while nine and one items, respectively, exhibited poor difficulty indices. Difficulty analysis indicated that nine items in 2022 and one item in 2023 demonstrated poor indices. No significant difference was observed in the psychometric properties of the two examination years (t = 0.75, df = 1050, p > .05). These results highlight inconsistencies in item quality across years, raising concerns about fairness and reliability in high-stakes assessments. The study contributes to discourse on large-scale assessments by situating Nigerian state-level examinations within global debates on fairness, accountability, and psychometric rigour. It further underscores the value of IRT in aligning Nigeria's assessment practices with international best practices. These findings underscore the importance of enhancing the psychometric quality of mathematics items and aligning evaluation practices with international standards of educational equity.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 13
University of Johannesburg (ZA), Obafemi Awolowo University (NG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
58.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.