The Recording of a Suspect’s Interrogation Using Audio or Video Devices: Postulates De Lege Ferenda and De Lege Lata

The current model of criminal proceedings assumes optional recording of images and sounds from recorded activities, including the suspect’s interrogation. Audiovisual recording of this type of procedural activity is rare in practice, which, considering the level of technological development, should force deeper reflection. Interrogation reports do not constitute a faithful representation of activities of particular importance for achieving the objectives of criminal proceedings. They also do not reflect the suspect’s full statement, the context in which his words are spoken, and the elements that make up the so-called non-verbal communication. The changes proposed in this article assume mandatory recording of all suspect interrogations, which is intended to meet high standards of a fair criminal trial and protect the accused from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2025.34.5.145-160
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Recording of a Suspect’s Interrogation Using Audio or Video Devices: Postulates De Lege Ferenda and De Lege Lata

Piotr Misztal
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

The Recording of a Suspect’s Interrogation Using Audio or Video Devices: Postulates De Lege Ferenda and De Lege Lata

Piotr Misztal
article en

Abstract

The current model of criminal proceedings assumes optional recording of images and sounds from recorded activities, including the suspect’s interrogation. Audiovisual recording of this type of procedural activity is rare in practice, which, considering the level of technological development, should force deeper reflection. Interrogation reports do not constitute a faithful representation of activities of particular importance for achieving the objectives of criminal proceedings. They also do not reflect the suspect’s full statement, the context in which his words are spoken, and the elements that make up the so-called non-verbal communication. The changes proposed in this article assume mandatory recording of all suspect interrogations, which is intended to meet high standards of a fair criminal trial and protect the accused from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment.

Studia Iuridica LublinensiaVol. 34(5)
University of Łódź (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.