Phishing Website Impersonation: Comparative Analysis of Detection and Target Recognition Methods

With the rapid advancements in technology, there has been a noticeable increase in phishing attacks that exploit users by impersonating trusted entities. The primary attack vectors include fraudulent websites and carefully crafted emails. Early detection of such threats enables the more effective blocking of malicious sites and timely user warnings. One of the key elements in phishing detection is identifying the entity being impersonated. In this article, we conduct a comparative analysis of methods for detecting phishing websites that rely on website screenshots and recognizing their impersonation targets. The two main research objectives include binary phishing detection to identify malicious intent and multiclass classification of impersonated targets to enable specific incident response and brand protection. Three approaches are compared: two state-of-the-art methods, Phishpedia and VisualPhishNet, and a third, proposed in this work, which uses perceptual hash similarity as a baseline. To ensure consistent evaluation conditions, a dedicated framework was developed for the study and shared with the community via GitHub. The obtained results indicate that Phishpedia and the Baseline method were the most effective in terms of detection performance, outperforming VisualPhishNet. Specifically, the proposed Baseline method achieved an F1 score of 0.95 on the Phishpedia dataset for binary classification, while Phishpedia maintained a high Identification Rate (>0.9) across all tested datasets. In contrast, VisualPhishNet struggled with dataset variability, achieving an F1 score of only 0.17 on the same benchmark. Moreover, as our proposed Baseline method demonstrated superior stability and binary classification performance, it should be considered as a robust candidate for preliminary filtering in hybrid systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020640
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phishing Website Impersonation: Comparative Analysis of Detection and Target Recognition Methods

Marcin Jarczewski, Piotr Białczak, Wojciech Mazurczyk
Applied Sciences
Spam and Phishing Detection
article

Phishing Website Impersonation: Comparative Analysis of Detection and Target Recognition Methods

Marcin Jarczewski, Piotr Białczak, Wojciech Mazurczyk
article en

Abstract

With the rapid advancements in technology, there has been a noticeable increase in phishing attacks that exploit users by impersonating trusted entities. The primary attack vectors include fraudulent websites and carefully crafted emails. Early detection of such threats enables the more effective blocking of malicious sites and timely user warnings. One of the key elements in phishing detection is identifying the entity being impersonated. In this article, we conduct a comparative analysis of methods for detecting phishing websites that rely on website screenshots and recognizing their impersonation targets. The two main research objectives include binary phishing detection to identify malicious intent and multiclass classification of impersonated targets to enable specific incident response and brand protection. Three approaches are compared: two state-of-the-art methods, Phishpedia and VisualPhishNet, and a third, proposed in this work, which uses perceptual hash similarity as a baseline. To ensure consistent evaluation conditions, a dedicated framework was developed for the study and shared with the community via GitHub. The obtained results indicate that Phishpedia and the Baseline method were the most effective in terms of detection performance, outperforming VisualPhishNet. Specifically, the proposed Baseline method achieved an F1 score of 0.95 on the Phishpedia dataset for binary classification, while Phishpedia maintained a high Identification Rate (>0.9) across all tested datasets. In contrast, VisualPhishNet struggled with dataset variability, achieving an F1 score of only 0.17 on the same benchmark. Moreover, as our proposed Baseline method demonstrated superior stability and binary classification performance, it should be considered as a robust candidate for preliminary filtering in hybrid systems.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(2)
Warsaw University of Technology (PL), Institute of Computer Science (PL), NASK National Research Institute (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Spam and Phishing Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.