Fiscal Policy and Social Equity: The Redistributive Effects of Government Spending on Inequality

The paper analyzes the redistributive impact of government expenditures on income inequality in Chinese provinces through a synthesis of fiscal incidence analysis, benefit incidence approaches, and panel econometric analysis. Based on provincial expenditure data for 2019-2021 and household-level inequality indicators, the analysis assesses the impacts of education, healthcare, social security expenditure, and intergovernmental transfers on driving market and post-fiscal income distribution. Findings indicate that the fiscal policy has a strong equalizing role in that the Gini coefficient of 0.467 (market income) is reduced to ‎‎0.414 when direct transfers are added and to 0.384 when in-kind education and ‎health benefits are subsequently added. The results of benefit incidence suggest ‎that education and healthcare expenditure are quite pro-poor, whereas social security-‎ty and welfare are almost neutral based on institutional fragmentation. Fixed-effects regressions establish the strong negative association between education ‎and health spending and inequality, and a weak and not statistically significant ‎association between welfare spending and inequality. Intergovernmental transfers ‎show the significant equalization effect, which displays the significance of central-local fiscal coordination. Taken together, the findings confirm the multi-‎channel ability of the Chinese fiscal system to diminish inequality, but also ‎point to the existence of structural constraints to redistributive possibilities, ‎notably in the welfare sector. Policy proposals aim at reinforcing human capital ‎expenditure, enhancing healthcare equity, reforming disjointed welfare, and allocating transfers to promote social equity‎.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14419/bh7rgd11
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fiscal Policy and Social Equity: The Redistributive Effects of Government Spending on Inequality

SHAMZAEFFA SAMSUDIN, Abu Sufian Abu Bakar, Shang Yao
International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

Fiscal Policy and Social Equity: The Redistributive Effects of Government Spending on Inequality

SHAMZAEFFA SAMSUDIN, Abu Sufian Abu Bakar, Shang Yao
article en

Abstract

The paper analyzes the redistributive impact of government expenditures on income inequality in Chinese provinces through a synthesis of fiscal incidence analysis, benefit incidence approaches, and panel econometric analysis. Based on provincial expenditure data for 2019-2021 and household-level inequality indicators, the analysis assesses the impacts of education, healthcare, social security expenditure, and intergovernmental transfers on driving market and post-fiscal income distribution. Findings indicate that the fiscal policy has a strong equalizing role in that the Gini coefficient of 0.467 (market income) is reduced to ‎‎0.414 when direct transfers are added and to 0.384 when in-kind education and ‎health benefits are subsequently added. The results of benefit incidence suggest ‎that education and healthcare expenditure are quite pro-poor, whereas social security-‎ty and welfare are almost neutral based on institutional fragmentation. Fixed-effects regressions establish the strong negative association between education ‎and health spending and inequality, and a weak and not statistically significant ‎association between welfare spending and inequality. Intergovernmental transfers ‎show the significant equalization effect, which displays the significance of central-local fiscal coordination. Taken together, the findings confirm the multi-‎channel ability of the Chinese fiscal system to diminish inequality, but also ‎point to the existence of structural constraints to redistributive possibilities, ‎notably in the welfare sector. Policy proposals aim at reinforcing human capital ‎expenditure, enhancing healthcare equity, reforming disjointed welfare, and allocating transfers to promote social equity‎.

International Journal of Accounting and Economics StudiesVol. 13(1)
Northern University of Malaysia (MY)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.