Examining the existing knowledge base for enablers of family recovery in mental health: A scoping review

Abstract This scoping review examines how enablers of family recovery are offered by mental health services. The review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for Scoping Reviews guidelines and Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework, aims to identify and define family recovery enablers, explore their usage, describe their benefits and challenges, and identify gaps in evidence. A comprehensive search of key databases, Medline, CINAHL, and PsycInfo, along with grey literature sources, yielded twenty-seven relevant studies. The enablers identified were grouped into five overarching headings of peer support, professional interventions, models for practice, community services, and individual factors. Enablers were put in place by adopting frameworks, the use of support materials, relational interactions, and accessing appropriate services. This led to a better understanding within the family, improved relationships and communication, and increased emotional support. Benefits included advocacy, empowerment, self-efficacy, and personal recovery for family members. Challenges included service issues like accessibility and confidentiality, study-related limitations, and individual and social factors. This review highlights a diverse range of enablers and their potential impact on family recovery within mental health services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Social Work
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaf282
Primary Topic
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the existing knowledge base for enablers of family recovery in mental health: A scoping review

Kerry Cuskelly, Gina Delaney, Brendan Leen, Michael John Norton
The British Journal of Social Work
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
article

Examining the existing knowledge base for enablers of family recovery in mental health: A scoping review

Kerry Cuskelly, Gina Delaney, Brendan Leen, Michael John Norton
article en

Abstract

Abstract This scoping review examines how enablers of family recovery are offered by mental health services. The review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for Scoping Reviews guidelines and Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework, aims to identify and define family recovery enablers, explore their usage, describe their benefits and challenges, and identify gaps in evidence. A comprehensive search of key databases, Medline, CINAHL, and PsycInfo, along with grey literature sources, yielded twenty-seven relevant studies. The enablers identified were grouped into five overarching headings of peer support, professional interventions, models for practice, community services, and individual factors. Enablers were put in place by adopting frameworks, the use of support materials, relational interactions, and accessing appropriate services. This led to a better understanding within the family, improved relationships and communication, and increased emotional support. Benefits included advocacy, empowerment, self-efficacy, and personal recovery for family members. Challenges included service issues like accessibility and confidentiality, study-related limitations, and individual and social factors. This review highlights a diverse range of enablers and their potential impact on family recovery within mental health services.

The British Journal of Social Work
National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE), University College Cork (IE), Cork University Hospital (IE), Mental Health Ireland (IE), St. Patrick's Hospital (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.