Probiotics in the ICU: a scoping review of evidence for infection prevention

Intensive care unit-acquired infections (ICU-AIs) are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Although probiotics have been investigated as a preventive strategy, clinical trials have reported conflicting results, largely attributable to heterogeneity in strain composition, treatment duration, and dosage. This scoping review aimed to examine the influence of strain specificity, intervention duration, and daily dosage on probiotic efficacy in preventing ICU-AIs in adults. We conducted this scoping review in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Embase) were systematically searched from January 2014 to September 2024 for English-language interventional and observational studies. Data on probiotic strain(s), duration, dosage (CFU/day), and infection outcomes were extracted and synthesised narratively. Ten studies (seven randomised controlled trials and three observational studies; total > 6,500 patients) were included, encompassing 18 distinct probiotic strains. Multi-strain preparations containing Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 (evaluated in four publications from two RCTs) were most consistently associated with benefit. All five studies using both intervention duration ≥ 14 days and dosage ≥ 5 × 10⁹ CFU/day reported significant reductions in at least one ICU-AI (100%; Fisher exact p = 0.007), whereas none of the five studies with shorter duration or lower dosage achieved significance (0%). Single-strain Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and low-dose regimens showed no effect. Current evidence indicates that probiotic efficacy against ICU-AIs is highly strain-, duration-, and dose-dependent, with multi-strain regimens containing Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 administered for ≥ 14 days at ≥ 5 × 10⁹ CFU/day demonstrating the most promising results. However, the limited number of studies and persistent heterogeneity preclude firm recommendations. Large, multicentre, strain-specific randomised trials are needed to confirm these observations and to evaluate safer alternatives such as postbiotics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Translational Medicine
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-07637-2
Primary Topic
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probiotics in the ICU: a scoping review of evidence for infection prevention

Tianyu Liang, Maomao Lv, Lulu Lou
Journal of Translational Medicine
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
article

Probiotics in the ICU: a scoping review of evidence for infection prevention

Tianyu Liang, Maomao Lv, Lulu Lou
article en

Abstract

Intensive care unit-acquired infections (ICU-AIs) are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Although probiotics have been investigated as a preventive strategy, clinical trials have reported conflicting results, largely attributable to heterogeneity in strain composition, treatment duration, and dosage. This scoping review aimed to examine the influence of strain specificity, intervention duration, and daily dosage on probiotic efficacy in preventing ICU-AIs in adults. We conducted this scoping review in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Embase) were systematically searched from January 2014 to September 2024 for English-language interventional and observational studies. Data on probiotic strain(s), duration, dosage (CFU/day), and infection outcomes were extracted and synthesised narratively. Ten studies (seven randomised controlled trials and three observational studies; total > 6,500 patients) were included, encompassing 18 distinct probiotic strains. Multi-strain preparations containing Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 (evaluated in four publications from two RCTs) were most consistently associated with benefit. All five studies using both intervention duration ≥ 14 days and dosage ≥ 5 × 10⁹ CFU/day reported significant reductions in at least one ICU-AI (100%; Fisher exact p = 0.007), whereas none of the five studies with shorter duration or lower dosage achieved significance (0%). Single-strain Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and low-dose regimens showed no effect. Current evidence indicates that probiotic efficacy against ICU-AIs is highly strain-, duration-, and dose-dependent, with multi-strain regimens containing Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 administered for ≥ 14 days at ≥ 5 × 10⁹ CFU/day demonstrating the most promising results. However, the limited number of studies and persistent heterogeneity preclude firm recommendations. Large, multicentre, strain-specific randomised trials are needed to confirm these observations and to evaluate safer alternatives such as postbiotics.

Journal of Translational MedicineVol. 24(1)
Hangzhou Medical College (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.