Is There Enough Sand in the Sandbox?

In the realm of rapidly advancing technologies, regulatory sandboxes have emerged as a promising solution to the regulatory challenges facing the FinTech industry. As a notable example of soft law, regulatory sandboxes offer a more adaptable framework for managing complex financial technologies. However, though the years their implementation across the EU has revealed several shortcomings. Furthermore, despite the intention to utilize regulatory sandboxes for AI regulation across the EU, there has never been a genuine effort to evaluate their effectiveness. This paper aims to measure the efficiency of current EU regulatory sandboxes from perspectives of regulators and participating companies. To achieve that, the research collects information on the claimed objectives of various EU regulatory sandboxes, categorizes them into regulator-oriented and company-oriented goals, and ultimately assesses whether these goals have been achieved from both perspectives. In addition, this research paper seeks to identify the flaws in the current regulatory sandboxes and propose potential improvements. By providing a comprehensive overview of the existing European regulatory sandboxes, the author highlights practical omissions encountered during their establishment and explores strategies to address these issues.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Business Law Review
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2025062
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is There Enough Sand in the Sandbox?

Anastasiia Dardykina
European Business Law Review
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Is There Enough Sand in the Sandbox?

Anastasiia Dardykina
article en

Abstract

In the realm of rapidly advancing technologies, regulatory sandboxes have emerged as a promising solution to the regulatory challenges facing the FinTech industry. As a notable example of soft law, regulatory sandboxes offer a more adaptable framework for managing complex financial technologies. However, though the years their implementation across the EU has revealed several shortcomings. Furthermore, despite the intention to utilize regulatory sandboxes for AI regulation across the EU, there has never been a genuine effort to evaluate their effectiveness. This paper aims to measure the efficiency of current EU regulatory sandboxes from perspectives of regulators and participating companies. To achieve that, the research collects information on the claimed objectives of various EU regulatory sandboxes, categorizes them into regulator-oriented and company-oriented goals, and ultimately assesses whether these goals have been achieved from both perspectives. In addition, this research paper seeks to identify the flaws in the current regulatory sandboxes and propose potential improvements. By providing a comprehensive overview of the existing European regulatory sandboxes, the author highlights practical omissions encountered during their establishment and explores strategies to address these issues.

European Business Law ReviewVol. 36(Issue 7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.