Blood Flow Restriction Does Not Impair Ankle Proprioception in Healthy Male Adults

Edgington, HCA, Lambert, AJ, Sophocleous, V, Waterworth, SPW, Barker, JT, Liew, BXW, and McManus, CJ. Blood flow restriction does not impair ankle proprioception in healthy male adults. J Strength Cond Res 40(4): e352-e357, 2026-Blood flow restriction (BFR) training has been widely used to enhance muscle strength and hypertrophy at low loads, yet its impact on proprioception, particularly ankle joint position sense (JPS), is not fully understood. This study assessed the effect of BFR on ankle proprioception in 30 healthy male subjects, who were randomly assigned to control ( n = 10), sham ( n = 10), and BFR ( n = 10) groups. Joint position sense was evaluated using constant error (CE) and variable error (VE) during passive ankle plantarflexion before, during, and after the intervention. The BFR group underwent 80% arterial occlusion pressure, whereas the sham group received minimal pressure. Results indicated a significant effect of the group on CE ( p = 0.016), with subjects in the control group overshooting the target angle more than those in the BFR group. However, no significant differences in CE were found between the BFR and sham groups ( p > 0.05). Variable error showed a significant effect of time point ( p = 0.048), but no interaction effect with the group was observed. These findings suggest that BFR does not impair ankle JPS accuracy or consistency in healthy males. These results provide evidence that BFR can be safely incorporated into rehabilitation or training contexts without compromising proprioception, making it a valuable option for populations that cannot engage in high-load resistance training. Future studies should expand on these findings by exploring varied populations and refining BFR protocols for optimal proprioceptive function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005329
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blood Flow Restriction Does Not Impair Ankle Proprioception in Healthy Male Adults

J. W. Barker, Bernard X.W. Liew, Chris J. McManus, Henry C.A. Edgington et al.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Blood Flow Restriction Does Not Impair Ankle Proprioception in Healthy Male Adults

J. W. Barker, Bernard X.W. Liew, Chris J. McManus, Henry C.A. Edgington, Alexander J. Lambert, Veronika Sophocleous, Sally P.W. Waterworth
article en

Abstract

Edgington, HCA, Lambert, AJ, Sophocleous, V, Waterworth, SPW, Barker, JT, Liew, BXW, and McManus, CJ. Blood flow restriction does not impair ankle proprioception in healthy male adults. J Strength Cond Res 40(4): e352-e357, 2026-Blood flow restriction (BFR) training has been widely used to enhance muscle strength and hypertrophy at low loads, yet its impact on proprioception, particularly ankle joint position sense (JPS), is not fully understood. This study assessed the effect of BFR on ankle proprioception in 30 healthy male subjects, who were randomly assigned to control ( n = 10), sham ( n = 10), and BFR ( n = 10) groups. Joint position sense was evaluated using constant error (CE) and variable error (VE) during passive ankle plantarflexion before, during, and after the intervention. The BFR group underwent 80% arterial occlusion pressure, whereas the sham group received minimal pressure. Results indicated a significant effect of the group on CE ( p = 0.016), with subjects in the control group overshooting the target angle more than those in the BFR group. However, no significant differences in CE were found between the BFR and sham groups ( p > 0.05). Variable error showed a significant effect of time point ( p = 0.048), but no interaction effect with the group was observed. These findings suggest that BFR does not impair ankle JPS accuracy or consistency in healthy males. These results provide evidence that BFR can be safely incorporated into rehabilitation or training contexts without compromising proprioception, making it a valuable option for populations that cannot engage in high-load resistance training. Future studies should expand on these findings by exploring varied populations and refining BFR protocols for optimal proprioceptive function.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchVol. 40(4)
University of Essex (GB), Medical Protective (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.