The ESG-Innovation Disconnect: Evidence from Green Patenting

We document that traditional energy firms are key innovators in the United States’ green patent landscape. These firms produce more, and significantly higher-quality, green innovation. In many green technology spaces, they appear to be influential first movers and to produce ongoing foundational aspects of innovation and commercialization on which other alternative energy producers build. They additionally invest significantly in labor and capital to complement these green innovations. These traditional energy firms, however, receive significantly lower environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores and fund flows and are not rewarded for incremental green innovation. This behavior is consistent with a competitive response by traditional energy firms to preempt obsolescence of current technology by investing in future replacement technologies. This paper was accepted by Bo Becker, finance. Funding: Funding was provided by the National Science Foundation [Grant SciSIP 1535813] and the Fordham University Gabelli School of Business—PVH Corp. Global Thought Leadership Grant on Corporate Social Responsibility. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.09124 .

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.09124
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
156.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ESG-Innovation Disconnect: Evidence from Green Patenting

2 citations
Management Science
Environmental Sustainability in Business
156.22
article

The ESG-Innovation Disconnect: Evidence from Green Patenting

article en
2 citations

Abstract

We document that traditional energy firms are key innovators in the United States’ green patent landscape. These firms produce more, and significantly higher-quality, green innovation. In many green technology spaces, they appear to be influential first movers and to produce ongoing foundational aspects of innovation and commercialization on which other alternative energy producers build. They additionally invest significantly in labor and capital to complement these green innovations. These traditional energy firms, however, receive significantly lower environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores and fund flows and are not rewarded for incremental green innovation. This behavior is consistent with a competitive response by traditional energy firms to preempt obsolescence of current technology by investing in future replacement technologies. This paper was accepted by Bo Becker, finance. Funding: Funding was provided by the National Science Foundation [Grant SciSIP 1535813] and the Fordham University Gabelli School of Business—PVH Corp. Global Thought Leadership Grant on Corporate Social Responsibility. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.09124 .

Management Science
DePaul University (US), Harvard University (US), The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
156.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The ESG-Innovation Disconnect: Evidence from Green Patenting · Management Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS