Νovel methylation biomarkers in liquid biopsy and classifying biosignatures for the clinical management of breast cancer

Breast Cancer (BrCa) remains a devastating disease presenting emerging needs for effective management. Recently, epigenetic biomarkers are assessed in liquid biopsy for diagnostic and prognostic applications. This study applies a 3-step data-driven biomarker discovery pipeline to identify robust methylation biomarkers and generate high-performance biosignatures specific for clinically significant BrCa end-points, followed by laboratory validation in patient cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Publicly available genome-wide methylomes from 520 BrCa and 185 non-diseased breast tissues (discovery dataset) were analyzed via Automated Machine Learning (AutoML, JADBio) to identify BrCa-specifically methylated promoters. Bioinformatic search revealed any BrCa biological relevance. Next, the methylation of identified promoters was experimentally validated in plasma cfDNA from 195 BrCa patients and 135 healthy individuals by Methylation Specific qPCR (qMSP) (validation cohort). Finally, autoML analyzed experimental and clinical data to develop optimized classifying biosignatures for diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction. AutoML identified 3 BrCa-specific methylated promoters in CLDN15, MRGPRD and ZNF430. Pathway analysis revealed implications with biological processes such as signaling and transcription. Laboratory validation using clinical cfDNA samples confirmed elevated methylation levels in BrCa patients for all 3 promoters, which were correlated with poor prognostic and predictive parameters. Classification analysis by autoML of experimental methylation measurements and patients’ clinical data built 5 specific models: a diagnostic biosignature distinguishing BrCa from health (AUC 0.79, CI: 0.75–0.84), a classification biosignature differentiating BrCa disease status (adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic group) (AUC 0.68, CI: 0.62–0.72), a prognostic biosignature predicting relapse (AUC 0.79, CI: 0.74–0.83), a biosignature predicting treatment response in metastatic patients (AUC 0.86, CI: 0.67–1.00), and a biosignature differentiating distinct molecular subtypes (AUC of 0.71, CI: 0.64–0.77), underscoring their possible clinical utility. Our data-driven approach successfully identified 3 BrCa-specifically methylated promoters in genes not previously implicated in BrCa. Their role in pathology needs further attention as they could also represent novel targets. Moreover, the laboratory validation in clinical BrCa cfDNA samples led to the development of 5 biosignatures, some demonstrating strong predictive performance. The low number of features and the minimally invasive nature of liquid biopsy highlight the potential for clinical implementation of great value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Breast Cancer Research
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02170-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
22.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Νovel methylation biomarkers in liquid biopsy and classifying biosignatures for the clinical management of breast cancer

Maria A. Papadaki, Stavroula Baritaki, Sofia Agelaki, Εkaterini Chatzaki et al.
1 citations
Breast Cancer Research
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
22.24
article

Νovel methylation biomarkers in liquid biopsy and classifying biosignatures for the clinical management of breast cancer

Maria A. Papadaki, Stavroula Baritaki, Sofia Agelaki, Εkaterini Chatzaki, Makrina Karaglani, Theodosis Theodosiou, Stylianos Souglakos John Kakolyris, Ioannis Tsamardinos, Kleita Michaelidou, Maria Panagopoulou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Breast Cancer (BrCa) remains a devastating disease presenting emerging needs for effective management. Recently, epigenetic biomarkers are assessed in liquid biopsy for diagnostic and prognostic applications. This study applies a 3-step data-driven biomarker discovery pipeline to identify robust methylation biomarkers and generate high-performance biosignatures specific for clinically significant BrCa end-points, followed by laboratory validation in patient cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Publicly available genome-wide methylomes from 520 BrCa and 185 non-diseased breast tissues (discovery dataset) were analyzed via Automated Machine Learning (AutoML, JADBio) to identify BrCa-specifically methylated promoters. Bioinformatic search revealed any BrCa biological relevance. Next, the methylation of identified promoters was experimentally validated in plasma cfDNA from 195 BrCa patients and 135 healthy individuals by Methylation Specific qPCR (qMSP) (validation cohort). Finally, autoML analyzed experimental and clinical data to develop optimized classifying biosignatures for diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction. AutoML identified 3 BrCa-specific methylated promoters in CLDN15, MRGPRD and ZNF430. Pathway analysis revealed implications with biological processes such as signaling and transcription. Laboratory validation using clinical cfDNA samples confirmed elevated methylation levels in BrCa patients for all 3 promoters, which were correlated with poor prognostic and predictive parameters. Classification analysis by autoML of experimental methylation measurements and patients’ clinical data built 5 specific models: a diagnostic biosignature distinguishing BrCa from health (AUC 0.79, CI: 0.75–0.84), a classification biosignature differentiating BrCa disease status (adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic group) (AUC 0.68, CI: 0.62–0.72), a prognostic biosignature predicting relapse (AUC 0.79, CI: 0.74–0.83), a biosignature predicting treatment response in metastatic patients (AUC 0.86, CI: 0.67–1.00), and a biosignature differentiating distinct molecular subtypes (AUC of 0.71, CI: 0.64–0.77), underscoring their possible clinical utility. Our data-driven approach successfully identified 3 BrCa-specifically methylated promoters in genes not previously implicated in BrCa. Their role in pathology needs further attention as they could also represent novel targets. Moreover, the laboratory validation in clinical BrCa cfDNA samples led to the development of 5 biosignatures, some demonstrating strong predictive performance. The low number of features and the minimally invasive nature of liquid biopsy highlight the potential for clinical implementation of great value.

Breast Cancer ResearchVol. 28(1)
University of Crete (GR), Democritus University of Thrace (GR), Mediterranean University (ME), Hellenic Mediterranean University (GR), Science and Technology Park of Crete (GR), University Hospital of Heraklion (GR), University Hospital of Alexandroupolis (GR), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
22.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.