Early-Stage Australian HCC Patients Treated at Tertiary Centres Show Comparable Survival Across Metropolitan and Non-Metropolitan Residency
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a significant public health challenge in Australia, with poorer survival observed in non-metropolitan populations. This study investigated whether survival disparities persist between non-metropolitan and metropolitan patients if only those with early-stage HCC treated at metropolitan tertiary referral centres are considered. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study across ten Australian tertiary centres involving patients with a new diagnosis of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0 or A, recorded from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020. Residential postcodes were entered using the Modified Monash (MM) model to define metropolitan versus non-metropolitan residence. The primary endpoint was adjusted for all-cause mortality. Results: Our study included 854 patients (metropolitan n = 612, and non-metropolitan n = 242) with a median follow-up of 42.6 months. We found no significant survival or mortality differences between the two groups with the unadjusted Kaplan–Meier survival analysis (log-rank test p = 0.612) and with the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (adjusted HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.64–1.34, p = 0.690). As expected, tumour burden, Child–Pugh Score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were significant predictors of mortality. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that previously observed survival disparities may stem from delayed diagnosis and reduced access to tertiary care in non-metropolitan regions and highlight the need for improved HCC surveillance and referral pathways, particularly for rural and Indigenous communities, to mitigate geographic inequities.
Authors
- Kathryn Gazelakis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6273-7994)
- Elysia Greenhill
- Daniel Saitta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0354-1614)
- Zina Valaydon
- Stuart Keith Roberts (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9015-7997)
- Nicholas Batt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0845-3341)
- Merlyn Joseph (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4190-8800)
- Amanda Nicoll (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1855-2757)
- Kate Collins (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6357-3867)
- Nicholas Hannah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1146-4308)
- Steven J. Bollipo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9511-7380)
- Rohit Sawhney (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8131-2182)
- Jessica Howell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9269-6249)
- Jonathan Abdelmalak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7550-8202)
- Joshua Haron Abasszade (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5469-4317)
- John Lubel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0828-0572)
- Myo J. Tang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4379-8713)
- Marie J. Sinclair (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0657-3048)
- Anouk Dev (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9339-8510)
- Stephen M. Riordan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5120-691X)
- John R. Zalcberg
- Claude V. Dennis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5341-0404)
- James Haridy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1534-3466)
- Simone Irene Strasser (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6374-1525)
- Dhivya Pandiaraja
- Eileen Lam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1244-3322)
- Suresh Sharma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4785-3337)
- Katherine Bateman
- Susan Byers
- Ammar Majeed
- Alexander J. Thompson
- Avik Majumdar
- Natalie L. Ngu
- Daniel Clayton-Chubb
- Siddharth Sood
- William Kemp
- Jacinta Holmes
Institutions
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
- Austin Hospital (AU)
- John Hunter Hospital (AU)
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
- Eastern Health (AU)
- Prince of Wales Hospital (AU)
- Footscray Hospital (AU)
- Western Health (AU)
- Monash Health (AU)
- Alfred Health (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Livers
- Published
- 2026-01-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/livers6010002
- Primary Topic
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00