Beyond overconfidence: Embedding curiosity and humility for ethical medical AI

Contemporary medical AI systems exhibit a critical vulnerability: they deliver confident predictions without mechanisms to express uncertainty or acknowledge limitations, leading to dangerous overreliance in clinical settings. This paper introduces the BODHI (Bridging, Open, Discerning, Humble, Inquiring) framework, a dual-reflective architecture grounded in two essential epistemic virtues: curiosity and humility, as foundational design principles for healthcare AI. Curiosity drives systems to actively explore diagnostic uncertainty, seek additional information when faced with ambiguous presentations, and recognize when training distributions fail to match clinical reality. Humility provides complementary restraint, enabling uncertainty quantification, boundary recognition, and appropriate deference to human expertise. We demonstrate how these virtues function synergistically in a dynamic feedback loop, preventing both reckless exploration and excessive caution while supporting collaborative clinical decision-making. Drawing from psychological theories of curiosity and cross-species evidence of epistemic humility, we argue that these capacities represent fundamental biological design principles essential for systems operating in high-stakes, uncertain environments. The BODHI framework addresses systemic failures in medical AI deployment, from biased training data to institutional workflow pressures, by embedding uncertainty awareness and collaborative restraint into foundational system architecture. Key implementation features include calibrated confidence measures, out-of-distribution detection, curiosity-driven escalation protocols, and transparency mechanisms that adapt to clinical context. Rather than pursuing algorithmic perfection through pure optimization, we advocate for human-AI partnerships that enhance clinical reasoning through mutual accountability and calibrated trust. This approach represents a paradigm shift from overconfident automation toward collaborative systems that embody the wisdom to pause, reflect, and defer when appropriate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Digital Health
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001013
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond overconfidence: Embedding curiosity and humility for ethical medical AI

Mahima Kalla, Justin Engelmann, Maximin Lange, Jana Sedláková et al.
2 citations
PLOS Digital Health
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
35.40
article

Beyond overconfidence: Embedding curiosity and humility for ethical medical AI

Mahima Kalla, Justin Engelmann, Maximin Lange, Jana Sedláková, Roben Delos Reyes, Mackenzie J. Meni, Leo Kinyera, Almog Hilel, Leo Anthony Celi, Anna E. Premo, Rowell Castro, Torleif Markussen Lunde, Ari Ercole, Sebastián Andrés Cajas Ordóñez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Contemporary medical AI systems exhibit a critical vulnerability: they deliver confident predictions without mechanisms to express uncertainty or acknowledge limitations, leading to dangerous overreliance in clinical settings. This paper introduces the BODHI (Bridging, Open, Discerning, Humble, Inquiring) framework, a dual-reflective architecture grounded in two essential epistemic virtues: curiosity and humility, as foundational design principles for healthcare AI. Curiosity drives systems to actively explore diagnostic uncertainty, seek additional information when faced with ambiguous presentations, and recognize when training distributions fail to match clinical reality. Humility provides complementary restraint, enabling uncertainty quantification, boundary recognition, and appropriate deference to human expertise. We demonstrate how these virtues function synergistically in a dynamic feedback loop, preventing both reckless exploration and excessive caution while supporting collaborative clinical decision-making. Drawing from psychological theories of curiosity and cross-species evidence of epistemic humility, we argue that these capacities represent fundamental biological design principles essential for systems operating in high-stakes, uncertain environments. The BODHI framework addresses systemic failures in medical AI deployment, from biased training data to institutional workflow pressures, by embedding uncertainty awareness and collaborative restraint into foundational system architecture. Key implementation features include calibrated confidence measures, out-of-distribution detection, curiosity-driven escalation protocols, and transparency mechanisms that adapt to clinical context. Rather than pursuing algorithmic perfection through pure optimization, we advocate for human-AI partnerships that enhance clinical reasoning through mutual accountability and calibrated trust. This approach represents a paradigm shift from overconfident automation toward collaborative systems that embody the wisdom to pause, reflect, and defer when appropriate.

PLOS Digital HealthVol. 5(1)
Florida Institute of Technology (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Mbarara University of Science and Technology (UG), The University of Melbourne (AU), King's College London (GB), University of Zurich (CH), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), ETH Zurich (CH), Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (AU), IIT@MIT (US), University of Bergen (NO), University College London (GB), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
35.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.