Cannabis, Extracts, and Individual Phytocannabinoids—All the Same or Substantially Different? A Call for Better Characterization of Cannabis Products

Cannabis and its derivatives are increasingly popular. The public perception of “cannabis” is commonly related to abuse potential with no sharp distinction to “marijuana”, “cannabinoids”, “hemp”, and cannabis derivatives. Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)—rich cannabis (“marijuana”), needs to be distinguished from hemp and cannabidiol (CBD)—rich; the former is psychotomimetic, while the latter is not, and it is increasingly used as a “health product”; the phytochemical composition makes the difference. However, this is still inadequately addressed. Without a detailed characterization of the components and effects conclusions cannot be generalized and are only applicable to the product used. Cannabis varieties have a highly variable phytochemical composition; the effects cannot always be attributed solely to the “main cannabinoids.” Growth conditions and processing methods also have a significant influence on the properties of the final product, even when the same cannabis variety is used. Therefore, the few comparative studies between extracts and the corresponding pure cannabinoids often produce conflicting results, as numerous preclinical and clinical examples demonstrate. They also show how little attention is paid to the phytochemical profile, even in scientific publications. Both in scientific research and consumer products, the phytochemical profile beyond the main cannabinoids should be disclosed in detail, especially since new cannabis products containing semi-synthetic CBD derivatives have recently entered the market.