The Sinking Mechanism and Active Control Method for Large-Scale Caissons

In the construction of large-scale caissons, it is difficult to obtain accurate values of the end resistance. There are also inclination, sand boiling, and other issues. In this study, a simplified calculation model for the broken-line end-bearing capacity was proposed on the basis of the passive extrusion failure theory of foundations. Simplified calculation formulas for the bearing capacity under different soil support conditions were established, considering the impacts of excavation or burial depth on the failure slip surface and bearing capacity of the foundation. In addition, the impacts of different shapes of caisson components on the end resistance were analyzed. On the basis of this analysis, a bearing capacity correction coefficient was introduced that considers three-dimensional spatial effects; the calculation results of the end resistance method deviate from the on-site measured earth pressure values by no more than 10%. The dominant influences of the inclining moment and resisting moment on the caisson’s attitude varied progressively as the caisson continued to sink. In the construction of large-scale caissons, end resistance emerged as the primary factor governing the caisson’s orientation. Accordingly, a “stepped progressive” sinking control method was developed and implemented during the caisson sinking operations for Pier No. 5 of the Changzhou-Taixing Yangtze River Bridge. By actively controlling the width of the supporting soil at the end of the caisson and the burial depth, the verticality of the caisson throughout the construction process remained within 1/150. The verticality of the final sinking of the caisson exceeded 1/2000, and the torsional angle of the final sinking of the caisson was only 0.07°. This achieved the active control of the end resistance of the large caisson, the process of sinking, the attitude during the sinking, and the risk of sand boiling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18010080
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Sinking Mechanism and Active Control Method for Large-Scale Caissons

D. J. Li, Yu Wang, Hong Zhang, Fuquan Ji
Symmetry
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

The Sinking Mechanism and Active Control Method for Large-Scale Caissons

D. J. Li, Yu Wang, Hong Zhang, Fuquan Ji
article en

Abstract

In the construction of large-scale caissons, it is difficult to obtain accurate values of the end resistance. There are also inclination, sand boiling, and other issues. In this study, a simplified calculation model for the broken-line end-bearing capacity was proposed on the basis of the passive extrusion failure theory of foundations. Simplified calculation formulas for the bearing capacity under different soil support conditions were established, considering the impacts of excavation or burial depth on the failure slip surface and bearing capacity of the foundation. In addition, the impacts of different shapes of caisson components on the end resistance were analyzed. On the basis of this analysis, a bearing capacity correction coefficient was introduced that considers three-dimensional spatial effects; the calculation results of the end resistance method deviate from the on-site measured earth pressure values by no more than 10%. The dominant influences of the inclining moment and resisting moment on the caisson’s attitude varied progressively as the caisson continued to sink. In the construction of large-scale caissons, end resistance emerged as the primary factor governing the caisson’s orientation. Accordingly, a “stepped progressive” sinking control method was developed and implemented during the caisson sinking operations for Pier No. 5 of the Changzhou-Taixing Yangtze River Bridge. By actively controlling the width of the supporting soil at the end of the caisson and the burial depth, the verticality of the caisson throughout the construction process remained within 1/150. The verticality of the final sinking of the caisson exceeded 1/2000, and the torsional angle of the final sinking of the caisson was only 0.07°. This achieved the active control of the end resistance of the large caisson, the process of sinking, the attitude during the sinking, and the risk of sand boiling.

SymmetryVol. 18(1)
Hohai University (CN), Hainan University (CN), CCCC Wuhan Harbour Engineering Design and Research (China) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.