Health status in patients with limited health literacy; development and validity of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire graphic (CCQg)

Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) often experience limited health literacy, hampering health status assessment via standard questionnaires like the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ). We aimed to develop and validate a modified, literacy-sensitive version, the CCQgraphic (CCQg), for all patients with COPD co-designed with a large stakeholder group. CCQ items were rephrased and complemented with graphics, followed by optimization through semi-structured interviews with patients with limited health literacy. In adequate health literacy (n = 64) concordance of CCQg and CCQ was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.92). Correlation with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.70-0.88). Agreement showed a mean bias of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.10-0.34, P < 0.001) with higher scores on mental and functional domains compared to the original CCQ. Test-retest reliability in limited health literacy (n = 25) was high, CCC = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86-0.97). The majority (88%) rated the CCQg as equal or better to the original. The CCQg offers a validated, literacy-sensitive tool, narrowing the gap in health status assessment for patients with COPD with varying literacy skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-025-00454-6
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health status in patients with limited health literacy; development and validity of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire graphic (CCQg)

Ellen Van Heijst, Aimée van de Maat, Kaying Kan, Maret Zonneveld et al.
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Health status in patients with limited health literacy; development and validity of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire graphic (CCQg)

Ellen Van Heijst, Aimée van de Maat, Kaying Kan, Maret Zonneveld, M Kerkhof, Bea Sloothaak, Natascha Huijser van Reenen, Janwillem H. Kocks, Johannes in ’t Veen, Cindy Lentjes, Thys van der Molen, Erlijn Tiel Groenestege, Iris van Geer-Postmus
article en

Abstract

Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) often experience limited health literacy, hampering health status assessment via standard questionnaires like the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ). We aimed to develop and validate a modified, literacy-sensitive version, the CCQgraphic (CCQg), for all patients with COPD co-designed with a large stakeholder group. CCQ items were rephrased and complemented with graphics, followed by optimization through semi-structured interviews with patients with limited health literacy. In adequate health literacy (n = 64) concordance of CCQg and CCQ was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.92). Correlation with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.70-0.88). Agreement showed a mean bias of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.10-0.34, P < 0.001) with higher scores on mental and functional domains compared to the original CCQ. Test-retest reliability in limited health literacy (n = 25) was high, CCC = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86-0.97). The majority (88%) rated the CCQg as equal or better to the original. The CCQg offers a validated, literacy-sensitive tool, narrowing the gap in health status assessment for patients with COPD with varying literacy skills.

npj Primary Care Respiratory MedicineVol. 36(1)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Sint Franciscus Gasthuis (NL), General Practitioners Research Institute (NL), Dialyse Centrum Groningen (NL), Observational & Pragmatic Research Institute (SG), CRV (Netherlands) (NL), Haga Hospital (NL), National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (US), Franciscus Vlietland (NL), Dutch College of General Practitioners (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Chiesi Farmaceutici
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.