Preliminary Latvian RESTQ-76 for Athletes: A Tool for Recovery–Stress Monitoring and Health Promotion

This study aims to report the first Latvian version of the RESTQ-76, focusing on its internal validity, reliability, structural validity, and the relationships between the factors of the questionnaire. A total of 394 athletes (225 men and 169 women), aged 18–30 years (average age = 21, SD = 1.65), participated in the study. They were recruited from various sports clubs and universities. The RESTQ-76 was translated into Latvian through a forward-backward translation process to ensure accuracy of cultural relevance. To examine the questionnaire’s structure, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed. This analysis revealed a stable four-factor model comprising 18 scales, with acceptable fit indices (RMSEA = 0.089, CFI = 0.914, TLI = 0.896, NFI = 0.889), indicating good model fit. The psychometric validity of the Latvian version is supported by the original, indicating it is appropriate for use in sports settings throughout Latvia. As research on training load and recovery continues to expand, tools like the RESTQ-76 are becoming increasingly important. They help athletes and coaches monitor recovery and stress levels, which is essential for optimizing performance and preventing overtraining in competitive sports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sci
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sci8010006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
57.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preliminary Latvian RESTQ-76 for Athletes: A Tool for Recovery–Stress Monitoring and Health Promotion

R. Licis, Žermēna Vazne, Juris Grants, Behnam Boobani et al.
1 citations
Sci
Sport Psychology and Performance
57.96
article

Preliminary Latvian RESTQ-76 for Athletes: A Tool for Recovery–Stress Monitoring and Health Promotion

R. Licis, Žermēna Vazne, Juris Grants, Behnam Boobani, Rihards Leja, Daido Dagne Bruvere, Artur Litwiniuk, Katrina Volgemute, Aleksandrs Astafičevs, Sergejs Saulite
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aims to report the first Latvian version of the RESTQ-76, focusing on its internal validity, reliability, structural validity, and the relationships between the factors of the questionnaire. A total of 394 athletes (225 men and 169 women), aged 18–30 years (average age = 21, SD = 1.65), participated in the study. They were recruited from various sports clubs and universities. The RESTQ-76 was translated into Latvian through a forward-backward translation process to ensure accuracy of cultural relevance. To examine the questionnaire’s structure, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed. This analysis revealed a stable four-factor model comprising 18 scales, with acceptable fit indices (RMSEA = 0.089, CFI = 0.914, TLI = 0.896, NFI = 0.889), indicating good model fit. The psychometric validity of the Latvian version is supported by the original, indicating it is appropriate for use in sports settings throughout Latvia. As research on training load and recovery continues to expand, tools like the RESTQ-76 are becoming increasingly important. They help athletes and coaches monitor recovery and stress levels, which is essential for optimizing performance and preventing overtraining in competitive sports.

SciVol. 8(1)
Latvian Academy of Sport Education (LV), Riga Stradiņš University (LV), Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Sport Psychology and Performance
57.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.