Can Deep Learning Exploit Nonlinear Market Signals for Volatility Forecasting? Evidence from Cryptocurrency Markets

This working paper studies whether deep learning models can improve out-of-sample volatility forecasting in the cryptocurrency market when compared with strong econometric benchmarks. Using Bitcoin as the primary case, we construct realized volatility measures and evaluate multi-step-ahead forecasts (e.g., one-week-ahead) under a rolling/expanding evaluation scheme. We compare a deep learning baseline (LSTM) against standard volatility forecasting models, including GARCH(1,1) and the HAR/HAR-X family. To test the incremental predictive value of nonlinear market information, we augment the feature set with commonly used technical and market indicators (e.g., MACD and liquidity/volume-related proxies) and conduct ablation-style comparisons. Forecast accuracy is assessed using multiple loss functions/metrics (e.g., RMSE/MAE and QLIKE) to reduce metric dependence. Across the evaluated settings, the econometric benchmark (HAR/HAR-X) is generally more stable and competitive out of sample, while the LSTM does not deliver robust improvements when trained on the same information set. These results highlight the importance of strong baselines, careful evaluation design, and the limits of model complexity in volatility prediction for this setting. Status: Working paper (not peer-reviewed).Keywords: volatility forecasting; cryptocurrency; realized volatility; HAR; GARCH; LSTM; time series; out-of-sample evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18148215
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Deep Learning Exploit Nonlinear Market Signals for Volatility Forecasting? Evidence from Cryptocurrency Markets

HAO YUN
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Can Deep Learning Exploit Nonlinear Market Signals for Volatility Forecasting? Evidence from Cryptocurrency Markets

HAO YUN
article en

Abstract

This working paper studies whether deep learning models can improve out-of-sample volatility forecasting in the cryptocurrency market when compared with strong econometric benchmarks. Using Bitcoin as the primary case, we construct realized volatility measures and evaluate multi-step-ahead forecasts (e.g., one-week-ahead) under a rolling/expanding evaluation scheme. We compare a deep learning baseline (LSTM) against standard volatility forecasting models, including GARCH(1,1) and the HAR/HAR-X family. To test the incremental predictive value of nonlinear market information, we augment the feature set with commonly used technical and market indicators (e.g., MACD and liquidity/volume-related proxies) and conduct ablation-style comparisons. Forecast accuracy is assessed using multiple loss functions/metrics (e.g., RMSE/MAE and QLIKE) to reduce metric dependence. Across the evaluated settings, the econometric benchmark (HAR/HAR-X) is generally more stable and competitive out of sample, while the LSTM does not deliver robust improvements when trained on the same information set. These results highlight the importance of strong baselines, careful evaluation design, and the limits of model complexity in volatility prediction for this setting. Status: Working paper (not peer-reviewed).Keywords: volatility forecasting; cryptocurrency; realized volatility; HAR; GARCH; LSTM; time series; out-of-sample evaluation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad del Noreste (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.