Board efficiency index, government ownership and financial performance of Shanghai stock exchange companies

Purpose This study investigates the impact of a multidimensional board efficiency index (BEI) on firm financial performance (FP) and examines the moderating role of government ownership (GO) in China’s emerging market. It addresses gaps in prior literature by integrating six board attributes into a holistic governance metric and testing the government influence. Design/methodology/approach Using panel data from 1,226 Shanghai Stock Exchange-listed firms (2018–2022), the study employs a system Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) model to mitigate endogeneity. BEI is constructed by synthesizing board size, independence, CEO duality, meeting frequency, political connections and financial expertise. FP is measured via Economic Value-Added Rate and Tobin’s Q. GO is operationalized as a moderating variable, with controls for firm size, leverage, R&D, age and management turnover. Findings BEI significantly enhances FP, validating contingency theory’s governance–performance linkage. However, GO negatively moderates this relationship, attenuating BEI’s efficiency due to socio-political objectives and bureaucratic constraints. Enterprises with high GO exhibit weaker alignment between governance rigor and FP. Robustness checks using alternative performance metrics (ROA and ROE) and fixed-effects models confirm these results. Research limitations/implications The focus on Chinese listed firms limits generalizability to other emerging markets. Unobserved factors, such as regional policy variations or market competition, may further influence governance dynamics. Future studies should explore cross-country comparisons. Originality/value This research contributes by proposing BEI as a novel composite governance measurement, advancing beyond fragmented analyses of board attributes. Providing empirical evidence from China’s hybrid economy, offering policymakers actionable insights to balance state influence with market-driven governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Accounting Research
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ajar-03-2025-0099
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Board efficiency index, government ownership and financial performance of Shanghai stock exchange companies

SAIDATUNUR FAUZI SAIDIN, Neilson Teruki, M. Rasid Osman, Shizong Wu
Asian Journal of Accounting Research
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Board efficiency index, government ownership and financial performance of Shanghai stock exchange companies

SAIDATUNUR FAUZI SAIDIN, Neilson Teruki, M. Rasid Osman, Shizong Wu
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the impact of a multidimensional board efficiency index (BEI) on firm financial performance (FP) and examines the moderating role of government ownership (GO) in China’s emerging market. It addresses gaps in prior literature by integrating six board attributes into a holistic governance metric and testing the government influence. Design/methodology/approach Using panel data from 1,226 Shanghai Stock Exchange-listed firms (2018–2022), the study employs a system Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) model to mitigate endogeneity. BEI is constructed by synthesizing board size, independence, CEO duality, meeting frequency, political connections and financial expertise. FP is measured via Economic Value-Added Rate and Tobin’s Q. GO is operationalized as a moderating variable, with controls for firm size, leverage, R&D, age and management turnover. Findings BEI significantly enhances FP, validating contingency theory’s governance–performance linkage. However, GO negatively moderates this relationship, attenuating BEI’s efficiency due to socio-political objectives and bureaucratic constraints. Enterprises with high GO exhibit weaker alignment between governance rigor and FP. Robustness checks using alternative performance metrics (ROA and ROE) and fixed-effects models confirm these results. Research limitations/implications The focus on Chinese listed firms limits generalizability to other emerging markets. Unobserved factors, such as regional policy variations or market competition, may further influence governance dynamics. Future studies should explore cross-country comparisons. Originality/value This research contributes by proposing BEI as a novel composite governance measurement, advancing beyond fragmented analyses of board attributes. Providing empirical evidence from China’s hybrid economy, offering policymakers actionable insights to balance state influence with market-driven governance.

Asian Journal of Accounting Research
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.